Zantzinger Vs. Old

Zantzinger vs Old

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1796

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78130

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/78130
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1796
Case Number: 2 U.S. 265
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Zantzinger

Respondent

Old

Excerpt

zantzinger v. old - 2 u.s. 265 (1796) u.s. supreme court zantzinger v. old, 2 u.s. 265 (1796) 2 u.s. 265 (dall.) zantzinger v. old supreme court of pennsylvania september term, 1796 a testatum ca. sa. had issued to the sheriff of lancaster, upon which the party was arrested, and the money paid. but the sheriff paid it over to the nominal, instead of the real, plaintiff, tho' the indorsement for the use, &c.; was on the writ. at the last term, hallowell obtained a rule to return the test. ca. sa. or to shew cause this day, why an attachment should not issue against the sheriff; and now, upon proof of service of the rule, he moved that the attachment should be awarded. by the court; let the attachment issue, returnable the last day of the term.

Full Judgment

ZANTZINGER v. OLD - 2 U.S. 265 (1796)
U.S. Supreme Court ZANTZINGER v. OLD, 2 U.S. 265 (1796)

2 U.S. 265 (Dall.)

Zantzinger
v.
Old

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1796

A Testatum Ca. Sa. had issued to the Sheriff of Lancaster, upon which the party was arrested, and the money paid. But the Sheriff paid it over to the nominal, instead of the real, plaintiff, tho' the indorsement for the use, &c.; was on the writ. At the last term, Hallowell obtained a rule to return the Test. Ca. Sa. or to shew cause this day, why an attachment should not issue against the sheriff; and now, upon proof of service of the rule, he moved that the attachment should be awarded.

By the Court; Let the attachment issue, returnable the last day of the term.

Same Parties Zantzinger vs Old Same Subject Service Tax