Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shaw Vs. Wallace

Shaw vs Wallace

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1792
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78048

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
2 U.S. 179
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shaw

Respondent

Wallace

Excerpt

shaw v. wallace - 2 u.s. 179 (1792) u.s. supreme court shaw v. wallace, 2 u.s. 179 (1792) 2 u.s. 179 (dall.) shaw v. wallace supreme court of pennsylvania september term, 1792 this cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. the defendant's attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff page 2 u.s. 179, 180 residing in new york. moylan, objected, that the motion came too late, after the cause had been marked for trial. but, by the court: it is never too late to grant the rule, when it will not delay the trial. rule granted.

Full Judgment

SHAW v. WALLACE - 2 U.S. 179 (1792)
U.S. Supreme Court SHAW v. WALLACE, 2 U.S. 179 (1792)

2 U.S. 179 (Dall.)

Shaw
v.
Wallace

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1792

This cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. The defendant's attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff

Page 2 U.S. 179, 180

residing in New York. Moylan, objected, that the motion came too late, after the cause had been marked for trial.

But, By the Court: It is never too late to grant the rule, when it will not delay the trial.

Rule granted.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial