Skip to content
Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

The Queen Vs. Arayi

The Queen vs Arayi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided May 10, 1883
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/780416
Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Queen

Respondent

Arayi

Legal References

Reported In
(1883)ILR7Mad17

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

Get a quick AI summary
  1. Open any judgment page.
  2. Click the AI Summary tab or button.
  3. Review facts, issues, and holding - verify against the full text before citing.

Excerpt

penal code, sections 21, 353 - public servant, court of wards' peon is not. - charles a. turner, kt., c.j.1. a peon employed by the manager of an estate under charge of the court of wards is not a public servant within the meaning of that term in the penal code.2. the conviction for an offence punishable under section 353 * of the indian penal code cannot be sustained; but as the accused is shown to punishable under section 352 of the indian penal code, the court will not interfere further thave committed an offence han to direct an amendment of the conviction and reduction of the fine to rs. 10.* revision case 211 of 1883 referred by h. e. stokes, acting district magistrate of tanjore.

Full Judgment

Charles A. Turner, Kt., C.J.

1. A peon employed by the manager of an estate under charge of the Court of Wards is not a public servant within the meaning of that term in the Penal Code.

2. The conviction for an offence punishable under Section 353 * of the Indian Penal Code cannot be sustained; but as the accused is shown to punishable under Section 352 of the Indian Penal Code, the Court will not interfere further thave committed an offence han to direct an amendment of the conviction and reduction of the fine to Rs. 10.

* Revision Case 211 of 1883 referred by H. E. Stokes, Acting District Magistrate of Tanjore.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial