Frey Vs. Leeper

Frey vs Leeper

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1791

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78027

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/78027
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1791
Case Number: 2 U.S. 131
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Frey

Respondent

Leeper

Excerpt

frey v. leeper - 2 u.s. 131 (1791) u.s. supreme court frey v. leeper, 2 u.s. 131 (1791) 2 u.s. 131 (dall.) frey v. leeper* supreme court of pennsylvania september term, 1791 the determination of this cause turned on the following point, which was submitted to the court, to wit; whether goods, which, after being distrained for rent, had been replevied, and delivered to the plaintiff in replevin, could be taken in execution. by the court: this point has been already determined in philadelphia. the lien on the goods is discharged by the security given to the sheriff; and as soon as they are delivered back to the plaintiff in replevin, they are open to execution, or a new distress. judgment for the plaintiff. footnotes [ footnote * ] decided at cumberland, nisi prius, before shippen and bradford, justices, in october, 1791.[ frey v. leeper footnote 2 u.s. 131 (1791) ]

Full Judgment

FREY v. LEEPER - 2 U.S. 131 (1791)
U.S. Supreme Court FREY v. LEEPER, 2 U.S. 131 (1791)

2 U.S. 131 (Dall.)

Frey
v.
Leeper*

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1791

The determination of this cause turned on the following point, which was submitted to the Court, to wit; whether goods, which, after being distrained for rent, had been replevied, and delivered to the plaintiff in replevin, could be taken in execution.

By the Court: This point has been already determined in Philadelphia. The lien on the goods is discharged by the security given to the sheriff; and as soon as they are delivered back to the plaintiff in replevin, they are open to execution, or a new distress.

Judgment for the Plaintiff. Footnotes

[ Footnote * ] Decided at Cumberland, Nisi Prius, before Shippen and Bradford, Justices, in October, 1791.[ Frey v. Leeper

Footnote 2 U.S. 131 (1791) ]

Same Parties Frey vs Leeper Same Subject Service Tax