Skip to content
How to use Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

Respublica Vs. Coates

Respublica vs Coates

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1790
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78012
Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
2 U.S. 109

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Respublica

Respondent

Coates

Bonus Feature

AI Studio

Get a comprehensive AI Brief with 18 structured sections - case summary, facts, prior history, citations, ratio, acts, and more - plus case-scoped chat. Brief the matter in minutes, not hours.

Log in to unlock AI Studio

Subscribers get structured AI Briefs and case-scoped chat. Learn more.

How to use AI Studio (bonus feature)
  1. Open a judgment with AI Studio on your plan.
  2. Click Open AI Studio on the case page.
  3. Review the AI Brief and ask questions in Ask the judgment - verify against the full text.

Excerpt

respublica v. coates - 2 u.s. 109 (1790) u.s. supreme court respublica v. coates, 2 u.s. 109 (1790) 2 u.s. 109 (dall.) respublica v. coates supreme court of pennsylvania june term, 1790 this was an action on an official bond executed by the defendant; and the real plaintiff, having neglected to strike a jury, the defendant's counsel moved for a rule for trial by proviso; but on a suggestion from the attorney general, page 2 u.s. 109, 110 approved by the court, that such a rule could not be granted against the commonwealth, the motion was made for a peremptory rule to try at the next term; under which the court said, they would order the jury to be qualified. levy for the plaintiff; serjeant for the defendant.

Full Judgment

RESPUBLICA v. COATES - 2 U.S. 109 (1790)
U.S. Supreme Court RESPUBLICA v. COATES, 2 U.S. 109 (1790)

2 U.S. 109 (Dall.)

Respublica
v.
Coates

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

June Term, 1790

This was an action on an official bond executed by the defendant; and the real plaintiff, having neglected to strike a jury, the defendant's counsel moved for a rule for trial by proviso; but on a suggestion from the Attorney General,

Page 2 U.S. 109, 110

approved by the Court, that such a rule could not be granted against the commonwealth, the motion was made for a peremptory rule to try at the next term; under which the Court said, they would order the jury to be qualified.

Levy for the plaintiff; Serjeant for the defendant.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial