Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sharpe Vs. Thatcher

Sharpe vs Thatcher

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1790
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78009

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
2 U.S. 77
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sharpe

Respondent

Thatcher

Excerpt

sharpe v. thatcher - 2 u.s. 77 (1790) u.s. supreme court sharpe v. thatcher, 2 u.s. 77 (1790) 2 u.s. 77 (dall.) sharpe v. thatcher philadelphia court of common pleas october sessions, 1790 this was a certiorari to remove the judgment given in this case by justice wharton. on a motion made by serjeant to reverse the judgment, it appeared that thatcher, the present defendant, had originally sued sharpe, the plaintiff, before justice page 2 u.s. 77, 78 coates, to recover a debt; that sharpe offered to make a set off, for water-money, that is, a charge for thatcher's drawing water at his pump; but that justice coates refused to admit it, and gave judgment for the debt demanded. that, thereupon, sharpe sued thatcher before justice wharton; and his son was sworn, as a witness, to prove an agreement between the parties, relative to paying water money, but he declared he knew nothing about it. that sharpe himself was then qualified to the truth of his account; and upon this evidence alone, justice wharton, gave judgment for the amount; though it was formally certified to him, that justice coates had already decided upon the same question. the court, in terms of great disapprobation, declared that no justice ought to take cognizance of a cause, which had previously been decided by another justice. but without taking that point into consideration, they said a judgment given, merely on the attestation of the party interested, could not be sustained. judgment reversed.

Full Judgment

SHARPE v. THATCHER - 2 U.S. 77 (1790)
U.S. Supreme Court SHARPE v. THATCHER, 2 U.S. 77 (1790)

2 U.S. 77 (Dall.)

Sharpe
v.
Thatcher

Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas

October Sessions, 1790

This was a certiorari to remove the judgment given in this case by Justice Wharton. On a motion made by Serjeant to reverse the judgment, it appeared that Thatcher, the present defendant, had originally sued Sharpe, the plaintiff, before Justice

Page 2 U.S. 77, 78

Coates, to recover a debt; that Sharpe offered to make a set off, for water-money, that is, a charge for Thatcher's drawing water at his pump; but that Justice Coates refused to admit it, and gave judgment for the debt demanded. That, thereupon, Sharpe sued Thatcher before Justice Wharton; and his son was sworn, as a witness, to prove an agreement between the parties, relative to paying water money, but he declared he knew nothing about it. That Sharpe himself was then qualified to the truth of his account; and upon this evidence alone, Justice Wharton, gave judgment for the amount; though it was formally certified to him, that Justice Coates had already decided upon the same question.

The Court, in terms of great disapprobation, declared that no Justice ought to take cognizance of a cause, which had previously been decided by another Justice. But without taking that point into consideration, they said a judgment given, merely on the attestation of the party interested, could not be sustained.

Judgment reversed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial