Ramappa Udayan Vs. Armugath Udayan

Ramappa Udayan vs Armugath Udayan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Oct 24, 1893

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/779821

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/779821
Court: Chennai
Decided On: Oct 24, 1893
Subject: Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Family

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramappa Udayan

Respondent

Armugath Udayan

Legal References

Cases Referred: Nallanna v. Ponnal
Reported In: (1894)4MLJ30

Excerpt

- 1. we think the case quoted by the subordinate judge at i. l. r. 14 m 149 nallanna v. ponnal, is sufficient authority for holding that a daughter's daughter is a bandhu on the principle laid down that consonquinity may be recognized as the basis of title to succession in the absence of preferential male heirs, minakshi was a direct relation by blood to her grandfather through her mother his daughter.2. the second appeal therefore fails and is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. We think the case quoted by the Subordinate Judge at I. L. R. 14 M 149 Nallanna v. Ponnal, is sufficient authority for holding that a daughter's daughter is a bandhu on the principle laid down that consonquinity may be recognized as the basis of title to succession in the absence of preferential male heirs, Minakshi was a direct relation by blood to her grandfather through her mother his daughter.

2. The second appeal therefore fails and is dismissed.

Same Parties Ramappa Udayan vs Armugath Udayan Same Subject Family

Family