Skip to content
Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

Ramappa Udayan Vs. Armugath Udayan

Ramappa Udayan vs Armugath Udayan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Oct 24, 1893
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/779821
Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Family

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramappa Udayan

Respondent

Armugath Udayan

Legal References

Cases Referred
Nallanna v. Ponnal
Reported In
(1894)4MLJ30

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

Get a quick AI summary
  1. Open any judgment page.
  2. Click the AI Summary tab or button.
  3. Review facts, issues, and holding - verify against the full text before citing.

Excerpt

- 1. we think the case quoted by the subordinate judge at i. l. r. 14 m 149 nallanna v. ponnal, is sufficient authority for holding that a daughter's daughter is a bandhu on the principle laid down that consonquinity may be recognized as the basis of title to succession in the absence of preferential male heirs, minakshi was a direct relation by blood to her grandfather through her mother his daughter.2. the second appeal therefore fails and is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. We think the case quoted by the Subordinate Judge at I. L. R. 14 M 149 Nallanna v. Ponnal, is sufficient authority for holding that a daughter's daughter is a bandhu on the principle laid down that consonquinity may be recognized as the basis of title to succession in the absence of preferential male heirs, Minakshi was a direct relation by blood to her grandfather through her mother his daughter.

2. The second appeal therefore fails and is dismissed.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial