Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Chellappa Chettiar and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 29, 1942
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/779278

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Chellappa Chettiar and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1942Mad715; (1942)2MLJ308

Excerpt

- orderhorwill, j.1. the district magistrate of ramnad has come to the conclusion that a case tried by the sub-magistrate of tiruvadadanai is beyond his jurisdiction, because there were allegations in the complaint indicating that an offence under section 148 indian penal code, was committed, which offence is not triable by a second class magistrate. the district magistrate has therefore referred the matter to this court in order that the case may be transferred from the file of that sub-magistrate to that of some magistrate having jurisdiction.2. the district magistrate has as much power to transfer under section 528 (2) of the code of criminal procedure as this court has under section 526, criminal procedure code; but neither the district magistrate nor this court ought to transfer a case where the magistrate has no jurisdiction, the proper procedure being for the magistrate to return the complaint, telling the complainant that he may present the complaint to the court having jurisdiction. the tribunal which is to decide at this stage whether or no the sub-magistrate should continue with the trial is neither the district magistrate nor this court, but the sub-magistrate himself. if he thinks he has jurisdiction, he must go on with the trial and dispose of the case. a magistrate always has jurisdiction to try an accused for an offence less than that revealed in the complaint, although it would ordinarily be improper for him to do so. if a magistrate at any stage of the trial is of opinion that an offence has been committed which cannot be tried by him, he should return the complaint as indicated above.3. no interference is called for at this stage.4. this reference is returned.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Horwill, J.

1. The District Magistrate of Ramnad has come to the conclusion that a case tried by the Sub-Magistrate of Tiruvadadanai is beyond his jurisdiction, because there were allegations in the complaint indicating that an offence under Section 148 Indian Penal Code, was committed, which offence is not triable by a Second Class Magistrate. The District Magistrate has therefore referred the matter to this Court in order that the case may be transferred from the file of that Sub-Magistrate to that of some Magistrate having jurisdiction.

2. The District Magistrate has as much power to transfer under Section 528 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as this Court has under Section 526, Criminal Procedure Code; but neither the District Magistrate nor this Court ought to transfer a case where the Magistrate has no jurisdiction, the proper procedure being for the Magistrate to return the complaint, telling the complainant that he may present the complaint to the Court having jurisdiction. The tribunal which is to decide at this stage whether or no the Sub-Magistrate should continue with the trial is neither the District Magistrate nor this Court, but the Sub-Magistrate himself. If he thinks he has jurisdiction, he must go on with the trial and dispose of the case. A Magistrate always has jurisdiction to try an accused for an offence less than that revealed in the complaint, although it would ordinarily be improper for him to do so. If a Magistrate at any stage of the trial is of opinion that an offence has been committed which cannot be tried by him, he should return the complaint as indicated above.

3. No interference is called for at this stage.

4. This reference is returned.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial