Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Queen Vs. Suppi and anr.

The Queen vs Suppi and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 16, 1882
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/777251

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Indian Arms Act, 1878, Sections 4, 5, 9 - Gunpowder and rockets for fireworks not ammunition. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Queen

Respondent

Suppi and anr.

Legal References

Reported In
(1882)ILR5Mad159

Excerpt

indian arms act, 1878, sections 4, 5, 9 - gunpowder and rockets for fireworks not ammunition. - innes and muttusami ayyar, jj.1. first defendant is a servant of a licensed vendor. neither of the two defendants is liable under the arms act, as the manufacture or possession of fireworks without a license is not contrary to that act. the manufacture or possession of fireworks, including rockets which are mere fireworks, does not come within the prohibition of section 5 of the arms act.2. the rockets referred to under the definition 'ammunition' are war-rockets.3. the conviction must be set aside and the fine refunded.

Full Judgment

Innes and Muttusami Ayyar, JJ.

1. First defendant is a servant of a licensed vendor. Neither of the two defendants is liable under the Arms Act, as the manufacture or possession of fireworks without a license is not contrary to that Act. The manufacture or possession of fireworks, including rockets which are mere fireworks, does not come within the prohibition of Section 5 of the Arms Act.

2. The rockets referred to under the definition 'ammunition' are war-rockets.

3. The conviction must be set aside and the fine refunded.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial