In Re: Govinda Rao

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 11, 1946

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/777122

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/777122
Court: Chennai
Decided On: Feb 11, 1946
Subject: Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Govinda Rao

Legal References

Reported In: (1946)2MLJ165

Excerpt

- order1. by clause 15 of the letters patent it is necessary that the judge who has passed the judgment in a second appeal shall certify it as a fit case for appeal in order that an appeal under that clause may lie. it is suggested that clause 44 somehow abrogates the effect of clause 15. we are unable to appreciate this contention. the petition is rejected.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. By Clause 15 of the Letters Patent it is necessary that the Judge who has passed the judgment in a second appeal shall certify it as a fit case for appeal in order that an appeal under that clause may lie. It is suggested that Clause 44 somehow abrogates the effect of Clause 15. We are unable to appreciate this contention. The petition is rejected.

Same Parties In Re: Govinda Rao vs Same Subject Civil

Civil

In Re: Govinda Rao

Brief this judgment before chambers

Case Summary

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Legal References

Excerpt

Full Judgment

Continue Your Research

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.