Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: T.A. Fernandez

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 04, 1958
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/776848

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: T.A. Fernandez

Legal References

Reported In
1958CriLJ1412; (1958)IIMLJ294

Excerpt

- rajagopalan, j.1. the full bench had declared the law that section 350, criminal p. c, did not apply to the special judge, before the criminal law amendment act, 2 of 1958, came into force. under the provisions of that act, the central act 46 of 1952 has deen amended and section 350, criminal p.c. as amended was made applicable to special courts. in view of this amendment, the opinion of the full bench expressed in this case has been superseded by legislation and hence we are not reporting the judgment.editor).v. t. rangaswami aiyangar for p. n. menon, for appellant; advocate general and public prosecutor, for the state.

Full Judgment

Rajagopalan, J.

1. The Full Bench had declared the law that Section 350, Criminal P. C, did not apply to the Special Judge, before the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2 of 1958, came into force. Under the provisions of that Act, the Central Act 46 of 1952 has Deen amended and Section 350, Criminal P.C. as amended was made applicable to Special Courts. In view of this amendment, the opinion of the Full Bench expressed in this case has been superseded by legislation and hence we are not reporting the judgment.Editor).

V. T. Rangaswami Aiyangar for P. N. Menon, for Appellant; Advocate General and Public Prosecutor, for the State.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties In Re: T.A. Fernandez vs Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Rajagopalan,; Somasundaram and; Balakrishna Ayyar, JJ.
Criminal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales