Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Nachimuthu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 12, 1958
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/776659

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - His petition in effect is for a review of the orders that have been already passed by the trial Court as well as the Appellate Court.

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Nachimuthu

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1958Mad452; 1958CriLJ1197

Excerpt

- - his petition in effect is for a review of the orders that have been already passed by the trial court as well as the appellate court.orderbasheer ahmed sayeed, j.1. the petitioner has exhausted all his. remedies available to him under the law. his present application is that the sentences that been already passed in four different cases should all be made to run concurrently. his petition in effect is for a review of the orders that have been already passed by the trial court as well as the appellate court.it is pointed out that there is no provision of law for such a review being entertained in orders passed under the criminal procedure code. if this were a matter of mere clerical error obviously some relief can be given in regard to the sentence.; but this is not so. it is therefore not possible to entertain such an application. the application is devoid of merits and it is therefore dismissed.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Basheer Ahmed Sayeed, J.

1. The petitioner has exhausted all his. remedies available to him under the law. His present application is that the sentences that been already passed in four different cases should all be made to run concurrently. His petition in effect is for a review of the orders that have been already passed by the trial Court as well as the Appellate Court.

It is pointed out that there is no provision of law for such a review being entertained in orders passed under the Criminal Procedure Code. If this were a matter of mere clerical error obviously some relief can be given in regard to the sentence.; But this is not so. It is therefore not possible to entertain such an application. The application is devoid of merits and it is therefore dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial