Udayar Pillai Vs. Muthia Pillai

Udayar Pillai vs Muthia Pillai

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Dec 01, 1896

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/775960

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/775960
Court: Chennai
Decided On: Dec 01, 1896
Subject: Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Udayar Pillai

Respondent

Muthia Pillai

Legal References

Cases Referred: and Abboy Chetti v. Ramachandra Rao I.L.R.
Reported In: (1897)7MLJ231

Excerpt

- 1. the decree of the district munsif is right for the reason stated by him.2. the pro-note is not payable to a specified person or to bearer or to the order of a specified person, and it is, therefore, not a negotiable instrurieiit. there is therefore, no objection to its transfer otherwise than by endorsement. in both the cases relied on by the petitioner pattat ambadi marar v. kishnan i.l.r. 11 m. 290 and abboy chetti v. ramachandra rao i.l.r. 17 m. 461 the notes were payable to a specified person or order, which made them negotiable instruments, and therefore not transferable except by endorsement.3. we dismiss the petition with costs.

Full Judgment

1. The decree of the District Munsif is right for the reason stated by him.

2. The pro-note is not payable to a specified person or to bearer or to the order of a specified person, and it is, therefore, not a negotiable instrurieiit. There is therefore, no objection to its transfer otherwise than by endorsement. In both the cases relied on by the petitioner Pattat Ambadi Marar v. Kishnan I.L.R. 11 M. 290 and Abboy Chetti v. Ramachandra Rao I.L.R. 17 M. 461 the notes were payable to a specified person or order, which made them negotiable instruments, and therefore not transferable except by endorsement.

3. We dismiss the petition with costs.

Same Parties Udayar Pillai vs Muthia Pillai Same Subject Civil

Civil