Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Queen Vs. Alexander Reddon

The Queen vs Alexander Reddon

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 31, 1883
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/775953

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1872, Section 308 - Compensation--Offence complained of. - - The sale to the purchaser is not the offence complained of within the meaning of Section 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Queen

Respondent

Alexander Reddon

Legal References

Reported In
(1885)ILR6Mad286

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1872, section 308 - compensation--offence complained of. - - the sale to the purchaser is not the offence complained of within the meaning of section 308 of the code of criminal procedure.muttusami ayyar, j.1. as ruled by this court on third december 1872, it was not lawful for the senior assistant magistrate to direct payment of part of the fine as compensation to an innocent purchaser of stolen property. the sale to the purchaser is not the offence complained of within the meaning of section 308 of the code of criminal procedure. the sentence of the senior assistant magistrate will be amended by striking out the words 'of which rs. 4-8-0 will be paid to mr. lewin, who purchased the ring for that amount.'

Full Judgment

Muttusami Ayyar, J.

1. As ruled by this Court on third December 1872, it was not lawful for the Senior Assistant Magistrate to direct payment of part of the fine as compensation to an innocent purchaser of stolen property. The sale to the purchaser is not the offence complained of within the meaning of Section 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The sentence of the Senior Assistant Magistrate will be amended by striking out the words 'of which Rs. 4-8-0 will be paid to Mr. Lewin, who purchased the ring for that amount.'

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial