Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Queen Vs. Ramachandrappa and ors.

The Queen vs Ramachandrappa and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 25, 1883
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/774629

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Regulation IV of 1816 Section 15, 16 - Penal Code, Section 174--Disobedience-of summons--Concurrent jurisdiction. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Queen

Respondent

Ramachandrappa and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
(1883)ILR6Mad249

Excerpt

regulation iv of 1816 section 15, 16 - penal code, section 174--disobedience-of summons--concurrent jurisdiction. - charles a. turner, kt., c.j.1. the provisions of the indian penal code are sot in conflict with those of the special law, and effect may, therefore, be given to both. by section 16(3) of the regulation, a summary power to impose a fine is conferred on a village munsif analogous to that conferred on the civil courts by sections 170* of the civil procedure code.2. in ordinary oases when there are no aggravating circumstances, the village munsif or civil court would act discreetly in employing the special powers conferred on it, but if a charge is instituted in a criminal court under the indian penal code, it must be dealt with by the court. the order referred must be set aside and the magistrate directed to resummon the accused and to complete the trial.* procedure if witness fails to appear.[section 170:-if such person does not appear, or appearing, fails to satisfy the court that he did not abscond or keep out of the way to avoid service of the summons, and that he had not notice of the proclamation in time to attend at the time and place named therein, the court may impose upon him such fine not exceeding five hundred rupees as the court, thinks fit, having regard to his condition in life and all the circumstances of the case, and may order the property attached, or any part thereof, to be sold for the purpose of satisfying all costs incurred in consequence of such attachment, together with the amount of the said fine if any:provided that if the person whose attendance is required pays into court the costs and fine as aforesaid, the court shall order the property to be released from attachment.]

Full Judgment

Charles A. Turner, Kt., C.J.

1. The provisions of the Indian Penal Code are sot in conflict with those of the Special Law, and effect may, therefore, be given to both. By Section 16(3) of the Regulation, a summary power to impose a fine is conferred on a Village Munsif analogous to that conferred on the Civil Courts by Sections 170* of the Civil Procedure Code.

2. In ordinary oases when there are no aggravating circumstances, the Village Munsif or Civil Court would act discreetly in employing the special powers conferred on it, but if a charge is instituted in a Criminal Court under the Indian Penal Code, it must be dealt with by the Court. The order referred must be set aside and the Magistrate directed to resummon the accused and to complete the trial.

* Procedure if witness fails to appear.

[Section 170:-If such person does not appear, or appearing, fails to satisfy the Court that he did not abscond or keep out of the way to avoid service of the summons, and that he had not notice of the proclamation in time to attend at the time and place named therein, the Court may impose upon him such fine not exceeding five hundred rupees as the Court, thinks fit, having regard to his condition in life and all the circumstances of the case, and may order the property attached, or any part thereof, to be sold for the purpose of satisfying all costs incurred in consequence of such attachment, together with the amount of the said fine if any:

Provided that if the person whose attendance is required pays into Court the costs and fine as aforesaid, the Court shall order the property to be released from attachment.]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial