Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Appasamy and Sons Vs. the State of Madras

Appasamy and Sons vs The State of Madras

Disposition Petition allowed Court Chennai Decided Sep 02, 1958
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/774226

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Tax Revision Cases Nos. 167 and 168 of 1956
Subject
Sales Tax
Disposition
Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Sales Tax
Outcome / disposition
Petition allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Appasamy and Sons

Advocate G.N. Chary, Adv.

Respondent

The State of Madras

Advocate The Additional Government Pleader

Legal References

Cases Referred
State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley
Reported In
[1959]10STC170(Mad)

Excerpt

- order1. the turnover, the liability of which to sales tax was in dispute, was rs. 36,020-10-0 for 1951-52, and rs. 1,12,147-14-6 for 1952-53. the tribunal treated the amounts as the turnover of works contracts executed by the assessee, and held that 70 per cent of the turnover was liable to be taxed. the amounts in question represented the charges collected by the assessee for carrying out embroidery work on the material supplied to the assessee by its customers. such contracts did not involve the sale of any goods of the assessee to the customers. the principles on which the question has to be decided, whether there was any element of sale in a given works contract, have been explained by us in our judgment in t.r.c. nos. 233 to 236 of 19561, on the application of the principles laid down by the supreme court in state of madras v. gannon dunkerley2.2. the assessments are set aside, and the petitions are allowed with costs in t.r.c. no. 167 of 1956. counsel's fee rs. 100.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. The turnover, the liability of which to sales tax was in dispute, was Rs. 36,020-10-0 for 1951-52, and Rs. 1,12,147-14-6 for 1952-53. The Tribunal treated the amounts as the turnover of works contracts executed by the assessee, and held that 70 per cent of the turnover was liable to be taxed. The amounts in question represented the charges collected by the assessee for carrying out embroidery work on the material supplied to the assessee by its customers. Such contracts did not involve the sale of any goods of the assessee to the customers. The principles on which the question has to be decided, whether there was any element of sale in a given works contract, have been explained by us in our judgment in T.R.C. Nos. 233 to 236 of 19561, on the application of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley2.

2. The assessments are set aside, and the petitions are allowed with costs in T.R.C. No. 167 of 1956. Counsel's fee Rs. 100.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial