Ramasami Vs. Gundappa and ors.

Ramasami vs Gundappa and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Oct 28, 1896

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/774172

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/774172
Court: Chennai
Decided On: Oct 28, 1896
Subject: Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramasami

Respondent

Gundappa and ors.

Legal References

Reported In: (1897)7MLJ49

Excerpt

- 1. the appellant built upon the land found to be the respondents' property in spite of a notice from the latter objecting to the erection of the building. under these circumstances the appellant cannot be allowed to rely upon the lapse of time before the institution of the suit in which possession founded upon his title was sought.2. as to the objection that the munsif had no jurisdiction, it is to be observed that the buildings did not form part of the subject-matter of the suit. the munsif had therefore jurisdiction to try the ease.3. the second appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.

Full Judgment

1. The appellant built upon the land found to be the respondents' property in spite of a notice from the latter objecting to the erection of the building. Under these circumstances the appellant cannot be allowed to rely upon the lapse of time before the institution of the suit in which possession founded upon his title was sought.

2. As to the objection that the Munsif had no jurisdiction, it is to be observed that the buildings did not form part of the subject-matter of the suit. The Munsif had therefore jurisdiction to try the ease.

3. The second appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.

Same Parties Ramasami vs Gundappa and ors. Same Subject Civil

Civil