Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pawan Carriers and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Pawan Carriers and anr. vs State of Rajasthan and anr.

Disposition Petition dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Nov 02, 2001
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/773201

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 410 of 2001
Subject
Constitution;Sales Tax/Vat
Disposition
Petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Section 78(5)--Constitutional validity--Section 78(5) is constitutionally valid.;Writ Petition Dismissed -

Key legal issue
Constitution;Sales Tax/Vat
Outcome / disposition
Petition dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pawan Carriers and anr.

Respondent

State of Rajasthan and anr.

Legal References

Cases Referred
D.P. Metals and Ors. v. The State of Rajasthan
Reported In
2002(3)WLN665

Excerpt

rajasthan sales tax act, 1994 - section 78(5)--constitutional validity--section 78(5) is constitutionally valid.;writ petition dismissed - rajesh balia, j.1.in this case the petitioner has challenged in the first instance the vires of section 78(5) and section 84(3) of the rajasthan sales-tax act, 1994.2. this court has earlier struck-down sub-section (5) of section 78 as ultra vires in m/s. d.p. metals and ors. v. the state of rajasthan vide its judgment dated 16.8.2000 passed in d.b. civil writ petition no. 1902/99. the said judgment has since been reversed by the hon'ble supreme court and the constitutional validity of the said provision has been upheld, therefore, that question no more survives for consideration. the challenge to vires of section 84(3) had earlier been waived of by the . learned counsel for the petitioner.3. under these circumstances, no question of vires now survires for consideration in this writ petition. even otherwise alternative remedy is available to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the concerned assessing authority by way of appeal.4. in these circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed reserving the right of the petitioners to file an appeal if they so desire within a period of three weeks. if such an appeal is filed within three weeks, the appellate authority shall entertain the appeal without raising objection about limitation and shall decide it on merits.5. no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

Rajesh Balia, J.

1.In this case the petitioner has challenged in the first instance the vires of Section 78(5) and Section 84(3) of the Rajasthan Sales-Tax Act, 1994.

2. This Court has earlier struck-down Sub-section (5) of Section 78 as ultra vires in M/s. D.P. Metals and Ors. v. The State of Rajasthan vide its judgment dated 16.8.2000 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1902/99. The said judgment has since been reversed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the constitutional validity of the said provision has been upheld, therefore, that question no more survives for consideration. The challenge to vires of Section 84(3) had earlier been waived of by the . learned Counsel for the petitioner.

3. Under these circumstances, no question of vires now survires for consideration in this writ petition. Even otherwise alternative remedy is available to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the concerned assessing authority by way of appeal.

4. In these circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed reserving the right of the petitioners to file an appeal if they so desire within a period of three weeks. If such an appeal is filed within three weeks, the Appellate Authority shall entertain the appeal without raising objection about limitation and shall decide it on merits.

5. No order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial