Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cwt Vs. Paramhans Ashram Trust

Cwt vs Paramhans Ashram Trust

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Feb 26, 2002
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/772498

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Decided On
Case Number
D.B. WT Ref. No. 17 of 1988 26 February 2002
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Counsels: Y.R. Singhi and Anuroop Singhi, for the Revenue Naresh Gupta and Mahendra Gargia, for the Assessee In the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench Y.R. Meena & A.C. Goyal, JJ. -

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cwt

Advocate Y.R. Singhi and Anuroop Singhi, <i>for the Revenue</i> Naresh Gupta and Mahendra Gargia, <i>for the Assessee</i>

Respondent

Paramhans Ashram Trust

Legal References

Reported In
[2002]124TAXMAN577(Raj)

Excerpt

counsels: y.r. singhi and anuroop singhi, for the revenue naresh gupta and mahendra gargia, for the assessee in the rajasthan high court, jaipur bench y.r. meena & a.c. goyal, jj. - orderby the court on an application under section 27(1) of the wealth tax act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), the tribunal has referred the following question for the opinion of this court :'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was justified in upholding the decision of the appellate assistant commissioner that the assessee is a public charitable and religious trust and its properties are entitled to exemption under section 5(1)(i) of the wealth tax act ?'2. at the outset, the learned counsel for the assessee submits that identical issue has been considered by this court in the case of this very assessee that the assessee is a public charitable and religious trust, therefore, is entitled for exemption under section 5(1)(i) of the act.3. decision of this court has been reported in cwt v. paramhans ashram trust (1995) 216 itr 580 . the view has been taken by this court in the case of this very assessee on identical question that the assessee is a public charitable and religious trust and no distinguishing facts are also brought to our notice to deviate from the view taken by this court in the case of this very assessee in the earlier assessment years. following the view taken by this court in the case of this very assessee, we find no infirmity in the order of the tribunal.4. in the result, we answer the question in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.

Full Judgment

ORDER

By the Court

On an application under section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal has referred the following question for the opinion of this court :

'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner that the assessee is a public charitable and religious trust and its properties are entitled to exemption under section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth Tax Act ?'

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the assessee submits that identical issue has been considered by this court in the case of this very assessee that the assessee is a public charitable and religious trust, therefore, is entitled for exemption under section 5(1)(i) of the Act.

3. Decision of this court has been reported in CWT v. Paramhans Ashram Trust (1995) 216 ITR 580 . The view has been taken by this court in the case of this very assessee on identical question that the assessee is a public charitable and religious trust and no distinguishing facts are also brought to our notice to deviate from the view taken by this court in the case of this very assessee in the earlier assessment years. Following the view taken by this court in the case of this very assessee, we find no infirmity in the order of the Tribunal.

4. In the result, we answer the question in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial