Prithvi Raj Vs. State and ors.

Prithvi Raj vs State and ors.

Disposition Petition dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Mar 27, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/772467

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/772467
Court: Rajasthan High Court
Judge: Bhagwati Prasad, J.
Decided On: Mar 27, 2001
Case Number: S.B. Cri. Misc. Petition No. 26 of 2001
Subject: Criminal
Disposition: Petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482--Question regarding the second marriage of petitioner is a question of fact--Concurrent finding of courts below on this question--No case for interference under Section 482.;Misc. petition dismissed -

Key legal issue: Criminal
Outcome / disposition: Petition dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prithvi Raj

Respondent

State and ors.

Legal References

Reported In: 2001(1)WLN736

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1973 - section 482--question regarding the second marriage of petitioner is a question of fact--concurrent finding of courts below on this question--no case for interference under section 482.;misc. petition dismissed - bhagwati prasad, j.1. heard.2. the present petition has been filed to impugn the orders wherein the wife has been held entitled for manitenance the learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the courts below has wrongly assumed that the petitioner has remarried. this is a question of fact. which has been found to be established on application of facts.3. no case for interference under section 482 cr. p.c. in exercise of inherent powers...by this court is made out. the misc. petition having no force is hereby dismissed.

Full Judgment

Bhagwati Prasad, J.

1. Heard.

2. The present petition has been filed to impugn the orders wherein the wife has been held entitled for manitenance the learned Counsel for the petitioner has urged that the courts below has wrongly assumed that the petitioner has remarried. This is a question of fact. Which has been found to be established on application of facts.

3. No case for interference under Section 482 Cr. P.C. in exercise of inherent powers...by this Court is made out. The misc. petition having no force is hereby dismissed.

Same Court & Year Rajasthan · 2001 Same Parties Prithvi Raj vs State and ors. Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Bhagwati Prasad, J.

Criminal question of fact Has been