Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Karta Ram Vs. Cit

Karta Ram vs Cit

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Nov 09, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/772411

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Decided On
Case Number
IT Ref. No. 120 of 1998 9 November 2001
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Counsels: None, for the Assessee Sandeep Bhandawat, for the Revenue Head Note: INCOME TAX Reference--DISMISSAL FOR ASSESSEE'S DEFAULTNotices issued by court returned unserved Catch Note: The High Court issued notice of reference to assessee as well as to the department--Notices have been sent to the assessee repea...

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Karta Ram

Advocate None, <i>for the Assessee </i>Sandeep Bhandawat, <i>for the Revenue</i>

Respondent

Cit

Legal References

Reported In
(2002)173CTR(Raj)96

Excerpt

counsels: none, for the assessee sandeep bhandawat, for the revenue head note: income tax reference--dismissal for assessee's defaultnotices issued by court returned unserved catch note: the high court issued notice of reference to assessee as well as to the department--notices have been sent to the assessee repeatedly--but they have been returned with endorsement that address given is not complete--it appears that assessee is not interested in persuing the reference--in view of this reference made by tribunal is returned unanswered. ratio: the high court issued notice of reference to assessee as well as to the department--notices have been sent to the assessee repeatedly--but they have been returned with endorsement that address given is not complete--it appears that assessee is not interested in persuing the reference--in view of this reference made by tribunal is returned unanswered. application: principle ennunciated in this case is applicable to current assessment year. decision: in favour of revenue. income tax act 1961 s.256(2) in the rajasthan high court n.n. mathur & o.p. bishnoi, jj. - - the tribunal made the reference by order dated 29-5-1998. this court issued the notice of the reference to the assessee as well as to the department on 8-1-1999, notices have been sent to the assessee repeatedly.by the court :this is a reference application under section 256(2), at the instance of the assessee. the tribunal made the reference by order dated 29-5-1998. this court issued the notice of the reference to the assessee as well as to the department on 8-1-1999, notices have been sent to the assessee repeatedly. but they have been returned with the endorsement that the address given is not complete. it appears that the assessee is not interested in persuing the reference. in view of this the reference made by the tribunal by order dated 29-5-1998, is returned the reference application accordingly stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

By the Court :

This is a reference application under section 256(2), at the instance of the assessee. The Tribunal made the reference by order dated 29-5-1998. This court issued the notice of the reference to the assessee as well as to the department on 8-1-1999, notices have been sent to the assessee repeatedly. But they have been returned with the endorsement that the address given is not complete. It appears that the assessee is not interested in persuing the reference. In view of this the reference made by the Tribunal by order dated 29-5-1998, is returned The reference application accordingly stands disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial