Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dhuma Devi Vs. State

Dhuma Devi vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Feb 11, 2008
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/771741

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7099/2007
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439--Bail--Grant of--Challan for offences under Section 302/304-B/498A/120/120-B IPC--Accused is mother in law of deceased--Deceased died because of strangulation--Height of the ceiling in the room, where deceased was lying at relevant time, was only 5ft.--No justification fou...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhuma Devi

Respondent

State

Legal References

Reported In
2008(2)WLN243

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1973 - section 439--bail--grant of--challan for offences under section 302/304-b/498a/120/120-b ipc--accused is mother in law of deceased--deceased died because of strangulation--height of the ceiling in the room, where deceased was lying at relevant time, was only 5ft.--no justification found for grant of post-arrest bail.;bail application dismissed. - - 1. heard learned counsel for applicant as well as the learned counsel for complainant and public prosecutor;ajay rastogi, j.1. heard learned counsel for applicant as well as the learned counsel for complainant and public prosecutor; and perused the material/record made available for perusal at the time of arguments.2. challan has been filed for offences under sections 302/304-b/498a/120/ 120b ipc against present applicant who is mother in-law of deceased (nisha). from statements of father and relatives of the deceased and so also of those who are neighbours residing nearby residence of her in-laws family, recorded under section 161 cr.p.c., which have been read over by public prosecutor and as per post mortem report, the deceased died because of strangulation and in the site plan shown to this court, height of the ceiling in the room (place) where deceased was lying at relevant time, was only 5ft.3. taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this court does not find justification for grant of post-arrest bail under section 439, cr.p.c. to accused applicant (smt. dhuma devi).4. consequently bail application stands dismissed.

Full Judgment

AJay Rastogi, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for applicant as well as the learned Counsel for complainant and Public Prosecutor; and perused the material/record made available for perusal at the time of arguments.

2. Challan has been filed for offences under Sections 302/304-B/498A/120/ 120B IPC against present applicant who is mother in-law of deceased (Nisha). From statements of father and relatives of the deceased and so also of those who are neighbours residing nearby residence of her in-laws family, recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., which have been read over by Public Prosecutor and as per post mortem report, the deceased died because of strangulation and in the site plan shown to this Court, height of the ceiling in the room (place) where deceased was lying at relevant time, was only 5ft.

3. Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this Court does not find justification for grant of post-arrest bail under Section 439, Cr.P.C. to accused applicant (Smt. Dhuma Devi).

4. Consequently bail application stands dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial