Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Panchi Devi and ors. Vs. Surajmal and ors.

Panchi Devi and ors. vs Surajmal and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Jan 23, 2006
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/771286

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Insurance;Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Insurance;Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Panchi Devi and ors.

Respondent

Surajmal and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
II(2006)ACC401

Excerpt

- .....rs. 1,50,000 against the loss of income of deceased to his dependents. i find substance in the argument of learned counsel for the appellants. undisputedly the age of the deceased at the time of accident was 42 years and as per the schedule attached to the act, the learned tribunal should have applied the multiplier of 15 instead of 10 while awarding compensation under the head 'loss of income of deceased to his dependents'. if the multiplier of 15 is applied, the amount comes to rs. 2,25,000 (15,000 x 15). in this view of the matter, the amount of compensation towards loss of income to the dependents, of the deceased is enhanced from rs. 1,50,000 to 2,25,000 and the claimant-appellants would be entitled to get increased amount of rs. 75,000 in addition to what has already been awarded by the tribunal.5. ordered accordingly. the respondents are directed to deposit with the tribunal the increased amount of rs. 75,000 within two months from the date of this order. on depositing the increased amount, the tribunal shall disburse the said amount amongst the claimants appellants. since the tribunal has already awarded interest @ 12% p.a. on the amount of compensation awarded by it, the appellants shall be entitled to get interest at he rate of 6% p.a. on the increased amount w.e.f. the date of this order till the payment is made to the claimants, if the increased amount is not deposited within the time stipulated.

Full Judgment

K.C. Sharma, J.

1. Through this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the appellants seek to modify the award dated 21.2.1994 passed by the learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur District, Jaipur whereby the learned Judge has awarded a sum of Rs. 1,65,000.

2. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and gone through the award sought to be modified. The learned Judge, on consideration of evidence and material available on record and having concluded that the accident took place on account of rash and negligent driving of jeep No. RJ-14-T-0253 by its driver has awarded a sum of Rs. 1,65,000 under the various heads, making the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 liable to pay the award amount to the claimant, jointly and severally.

3. The only grievance of the learned Counsel for the appellants is that the age of the deceased was 42 years at the time of accident and, therefore, the learned Tribunal, while assessing the income of the deceased should have applied the multiplier of 15 as per the Schedule attached to the Act. The learned Judge has committed serious error in applying the multiplier of 10 while assessing the income of the deceased.

4. I have considered the above argument. A perusal of the award sought to be modified shows that in awarding compensation, the learned Judge has assessed the gross income of the deceased at Rs. 22,000 per annum at the time of accident and after deducting 1/3rd of income for his personal expenses and having assessed his net income at Rs. 15,000 p.a., applied multiplier of 10 and awarded a sum of Rs. 1,50,000 against the loss of income of deceased to his dependents. I find substance in the argument of learned Counsel for the appellants. Undisputedly the age of the deceased at the time of accident was 42 years and as per the Schedule attached to the Act, the learned Tribunal should have applied the multiplier of 15 instead of 10 while awarding compensation under the head 'loss of income of deceased to his dependents'. If the multiplier of 15 is applied, the amount comes to Rs. 2,25,000 (15,000 x 15). In this view of the matter, the amount of compensation towards loss of income to the dependents, of the deceased is enhanced from Rs. 1,50,000 to 2,25,000 and the claimant-appellants would be entitled to get increased amount of Rs. 75,000 in addition to what has already been awarded by the Tribunal.

5. Ordered accordingly. The respondents are directed to deposit with the Tribunal the increased amount of Rs. 75,000 within two months from the date of this order. On depositing the increased amount, the Tribunal shall disburse the said amount amongst the claimants appellants. Since the Tribunal has already awarded interest @ 12% p.a. on the amount of compensation awarded by it, the appellants shall be entitled to get interest at he rate of 6% p.a. on the increased amount w.e.f. the date of this order till the payment is made to the claimants, if the increased amount is not deposited within the time stipulated.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial