Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rameshwar Lal Vs. Pyar Chand

Rameshwar Lal vs Pyar Chand

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided May 05, 2003
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/770971

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 115, Order 37 Rule 3(5)--Summary suit--Leave to defend granted to defendant petitioner by trial Court in suit filed by plaintiff under Order 37 Rule 3(5)--However with condition of furnishing bank guarantee for sum of Rs. 90,100--In the interest of justice as it appears more oner...

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rameshwar Lal

Respondent

Pyar Chand

Legal References

Reported In
2003(3)WLN381

Excerpt

civil procedure code, 1908 - section 115, order 37 rule 3(5)--summary suit--leave to defend granted to defendant petitioner by trial court in suit filed by plaintiff under order 37 rule 3(5)--however with condition of furnishing bank guarantee for sum of rs. 90,100--in the interest of justice as it appears more onerous to defendant--condition liable to be modified to the extent that he is liable to furnish the solvent security of his immovable property for sum of rs. 90,100--however trial court will accept the security of immoveble property after hearing plaintiff also.;revision partly allowed - prakash tatia, j.1. at the request of learned counsel for the parties the matter heard finally.2. the petitioner is aggrieved against the order dated 6.8.2002 by which the trial court granted leave to defend the suit filed by the plaintiff under order 37 rule 3(5), cpc, but with condition of furnishing bank guarantee for sum of rs. 90,100/-.3. i perused the impugned order dated 6.8.2002 and after hearing the arguments of the parties it appears that the condition of furnishing bank guarantee in the facts of this case appears to be more onerous on the defendant and the interest of the parties can be served by modifying this condition of furnishing bank guarantee by asking the defendant-petitioner to furnish the solvent security of immovable property before the trial court for sum of rs. 90,100/-. the trial court will accept the solvent security of immovable property after hearing the plaintiff also. the defendant is permitted to submit the solvent security of immovable property before the trial court within one month from today.4. the revision petition of the petitioner is, therefore, partly allowed.

Full Judgment

Prakash Tatia, J.

1. At the request of learned counsel for the parties the matter heard finally.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order dated 6.8.2002 by which the trial Court granted leave to defend the suit filed by the plaintiff under Order 37 Rule 3(5), CPC, but with condition of furnishing bank guarantee for sum of Rs. 90,100/-.

3. I perused the impugned order dated 6.8.2002 and after hearing the arguments of the parties it appears that the condition of furnishing bank guarantee in the facts of this case appears to be more onerous on the defendant and the interest of the parties can be served by modifying this condition of furnishing bank guarantee by asking the defendant-petitioner to furnish the solvent security of immovable property before the trial Court for sum of Rs. 90,100/-. The trial Court will accept the solvent security of immovable property after hearing the plaintiff also. The defendant is permitted to submit the solvent security of immovable property before the trial Court within one month from today.

4. The revision petition of the petitioner is, therefore, partly allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial