Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devi Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Devi Lal vs State of Rajasthan

Disposition Application dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Aug 21, 1987
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/770496

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Criminal Misc. Appl. No. 38 of 1983
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Application dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482--Total sentence of 6 years already elapsed--Held, it is no use to direct concurrent running of sentence.;Appeal Dismissed - LABOUR & SERVICESAppointment: [Shiv Kumar Sharma, Ashok Parihar & K.S. Rathore, JJ] Merit list Rajasthan Secondary Education Act (42 of 1957), Section 28 ...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Application dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devi Lal

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1987WLN(UC)548

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - section 482--total sentence of 6 years already elapsed--held, it is no use to direct concurrent running of sentence.;appeal dismissed - labour & servicesappointment: [shiv kumar sharma, ashok parihar & k.s. rathore, jj] merit list rajasthan secondary education act (42 of 1957), section 28 & rajasthan board of secondary education rules, rule 20 - held, improved marks obtained by candidate after re-appearing in examination can be considered for drawing the merit list of candidate for appointment to post of teacher. circular issued by the director of primary & secondary education ousting such candidate from consideration in merit list is illegal and without jurisdiction.shyam sunder byas, j.1. in his application under section 482 cr. pc it was prayed by the accused devi lal that the sentences of imprisonment awarded to him may be directed to run concurrently. the accused was sentenced by two judgments dated 3-4-1980. by now he must have served all the terms of sentences. the total sentence awarded to him was of six years which must have elapsed somewhere in the year 1986.2. in view of the aforesaid circumstances, there is no use in directing this sentence to run concurrently. the accused's application under section 482, cr. pc is, therefore, dismissed.

Full Judgment

Shyam Sunder Byas, J.

1. In his application under Section 482 Cr. PC it was prayed by the accused Devi Lal that the sentences of imprisonment awarded to him may be directed to run concurrently. The accused was sentenced by two judgments dated 3-4-1980. By now he must have served all the terms of sentences. The total sentence awarded to him was of six years which must have elapsed somewhere in the year 1986.

2. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, there is no use in directing this sentence to run concurrently. The accused's application under Section 482, Cr. PC is, therefore, dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial