Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Man Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Man Singh vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Mar 29, 2000
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/770344

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Cri. Misc. Application No. 907 of 2000
Subject
Narcotics;Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439--Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985--Sections 8, 12 & 50--Bail--Petitioner found in possession of only 48 grams of opium--Provision of Section 50 of the NDPS Act not complied with strictly--Bail granted.;Bail Granted -

Key legal issue
Narcotics;Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Man Singh

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
2000(2)WLN717

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1973 - section 439--narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985--sections 8, 12 & 50--bail--petitioner found in possession of only 48 grams of opium--provision of section 50 of the ndps act not complied with strictly--bail granted.;bail granted - p.p. naolekar, j.1. the petitioner was arrested for an offence under section 8/18 of the ndps act. it is alleged in the first information report that on 15.3.2000, the applicant was searched and was found carrying 48 grams of opium. it is alleged in the first information report that he was arrested on the information supplied by the motbir that a man is carrying on business of selling opium. it does not appear that a person carrying on business of selling opium, will carry only 48 grams of opium. apart from that it appears that the prosecution has not complied with, strictly, the provisions of section 50 of the ndps act. having considered all the facts. i direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail under section 439 cr. p.c.2. it is, therefore, directed that accused petitioner man singh s/o udham singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of rs. 30,000/- (rupees thirity thousand) with two sureties in the sum of rs. 15,000/- each to the satisifaction of the trial court with the stipulation to appear in that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial against him in this case.

Full Judgment

P.P. Naolekar, J.

1. The petitioner was arrested for an offence under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act. It is alleged in the first information report that on 15.3.2000, the applicant was searched and was found carrying 48 grams of opium. It is alleged in the first information report that he was arrested on the information supplied by the Motbir that a man is carrying on business of selling opium. It does not appear that a person carrying on business of selling opium, will carry only 48 grams of opium. Apart from that it appears that the prosecution has not complied with, strictly, the provisions of Section 50 of the NDPS Act. Having considered all the facts. I direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail under Section 439 Cr. P.C.

2. It is, therefore, directed that accused petitioner Man Singh S/o Udham Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirity thousand) with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- each to the satisifaction of the trial court with the stipulation to appear in that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial against him in this case.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial