Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ashok Kumar Karola Vs. Union of India

Ashok Kumar Karola vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Jan 03, 2003
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/770241

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Decided On
Case Number
D.B. IT Appeal No. 77 of 2000 3 January 2003
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Counsels: A. Kasliwal, for the Assessee R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue In the High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench Y.R. Meena & K.C. Sharma, JJ. - - The Tribunal has found that the notice issued under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act is bad in law as the income shown by the assessee in the return was below...

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashok Kumar Karola

Advocate A. Kasliwal, <i>for the Assessee </i>R.B. Mathur, <i>for the Revenue </i>

Respondent

Union of India

Legal References

Reported In
[2003]131TAXMAN821(Raj)

Excerpt

counsels: a. kasliwal, for the assessee r.b. mathur, for the revenue in the high court of rajasthan, jaipur bench y.r. meena & k.c. sharma, jj. - - the tribunal has found that the notice issued under section 143(2) of the income tax act is bad in law as the income shown by the assessee in the return was below the taxable income.orderheard learned counsel for the parties.2. to cut short, mr. mathur, learned counsel for the revenue submits that the matter has to be referred back to the assessing officer for following the correct procedure before making the assessment. the tribunal has found that the notice issued under section 143(2) of the income tax act is bad in law as the income shown by the assessee in the return was below the taxable income. therefore, the return should be treated as non est and the tribunal has ultimately directed for fresh assessment after following the due process of law, i.e., the correct procedure for assessment in search case specially when the assessee has shown the income below taxable rates.3. mr. kasliwal, learned counsel appearing for the assessee submits that he is not seriously agitating the proposal given by mr. mathur but the decision of the allahabad high court should not be followed in view of the latest decision of their lordships in the case of cit v. piara singh : [1980]124itr40(sc) .considering the submissions, we do not find any infirmity so far as the matter is to be remitted back to the assessing officer. however, the assessing officer is directed to follow the correct procedure for assessment of income-tax in search case. we made it clear that the assessing officer should complete the assessment in accordance with law taking into account all the decisions of their lordships on the issue including the decision in the case of piara singh (supra).4. with the above directions, the appeal stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. To cut short, Mr. Mathur, learned counsel for the revenue submits that the matter has to be referred back to the assessing officer for following the correct procedure before making the assessment. The Tribunal has found that the notice issued under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act is bad in law as the income shown by the assessee in the return was below the taxable income. Therefore, the return should be treated as non est and the Tribunal has ultimately directed for fresh assessment after following the due process of law, i.e., the correct procedure for assessment in search case specially when the assessee has shown the income below taxable rates.

3. Mr. Kasliwal, learned counsel appearing for the assessee submits that he is not seriously agitating the proposal given by Mr. Mathur but the decision of the Allahabad High Court should not be followed in view of the latest decision of their Lordships in the case of CIT v. Piara Singh : [1980]124ITR40(SC) .

Considering the submissions, we do not find any infirmity so far as the matter is to be remitted back to the assessing officer. However, the assessing officer is directed to follow the correct procedure for assessment of income-tax in search case. We made it clear that the assessing officer should complete the assessment in accordance with law taking into account all the decisions of their Lordships on the issue including the decision in the case of Piara Singh (supra).

4. With the above directions, the appeal stands disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial