Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Natha Vs. State of Rajasthan

Natha vs State of Rajasthan

Disposition Application dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Jan 01, 1985
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/770186

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
D.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 36 of 1985
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Application dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482--Inherent powers-Prayer for inserting arguments as to form part of judgment--Held, inherent powers cannot be invoked for purpose specified in Section 482;Application Dismissed -

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Application dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Natha

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1985WLN(UC)633

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - section 482--inherent powers-prayer for inserting arguments as to form part of judgment--held, inherent powers cannot be invoked for purpose specified in section 482;application dismissed - 1. mr. advani has filed an application under section 482 cr.pc on january 7, 1985 praying that the petition may be accepted, that the appeal may be allowed and the appellant may be acquitted. in the alternative, it has been prayed that the arguments mentioned in the petition may be inserted so as to form part of the judgment.2. we have considered the judgment dated december 17, 1984 and also examined the petitions under section 482 cr.pc.3. inherent powers of the court cannot be invoked for the purpose specified in the petition under section 482 cr.pc. the petition is frivolous and it is hereby dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. Mr. Advani has filed an application under Section 482 Cr.PC on January 7, 1985 praying that the petition may be accepted, that the appeal may be allowed and the appellant may be acquitted. In the alternative, it has been prayed that the arguments mentioned in the petition may be inserted so as to form part of the judgment.

2. We have considered the judgment dated December 17, 1984 and also examined the petitions under Section 482 Cr.PC.

3. Inherent powers of the Court cannot be invoked for the purpose specified in the petition under Section 482 Cr.PC. The petition is frivolous and it is hereby dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial