Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Magiya Vs. State of Rajasthan

Magiya vs State of Rajasthan

Disposition Appeal dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Jul 02, 1986
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/769670

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Cr. Appeal No. 293 of 1978
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Appeal dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code - Section 376--Rape--Sentence--Allegation well proved--Accused 40 years old and girl of tender age--Offence is barberic and reprehensible--Held, leniency would amount to abatement and slur against society and womanhood.;The allegation of rape is well-proved. The girl is of very tender age and the rape on ...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Appeal dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Magiya

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1986WLN(UC)587

Excerpt

penal code - section 376--rape--sentence--allegation well proved--accused 40 years old and girl of tender age--offence is barberic and reprehensible--held, leniency would amount to abatement and slur against society and womanhood.;the allegation of rape is well-proved. the girl is of very tender age and the rape on the girl of such a tender by an adult of 40 years is most reprehensible and barberic. there is, therefore, no scope for having any leniency or taking liberal view, which if taken, in my view, would tantamount to abatement of such heinous offence which slur against the society and womanhood as a whole.;appeal dismissed - - 3. on a thoughtful consideration of the entire evidence including the evidence of the prosecutrix and the medical evidence, i am of opinion that the allegation of rape is well-proved.guman mal lodha, j.1. magiya has filed this appeal against the judgment dated august 11, 1978 of the learned addl. sessions judge, sirohi, by which he convicted the accused-appellant under section 376, ipc and sentenced him to five years rigorous imprisonment and fine of rs. 200/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment of four months.2. the prosecutrix mst. kasu was only nine years of age when she was ravished by the accused, who is alleged to be of 40 years of age. according to the medical evidence, such injury can be caused by fingering also if the finger has got nails, as there was lacerated wound on posterior fornix of vagina. it was swollen but not ruptured. pw 7 dr. s.p. purohit has testified that there was lacerated wound on left side of vagina adjacent to hymen and fresh blood was oozing out. according to the medical evidence, forcible sexual intercourse was committed with the girl within six hours of her medical examination. there was another injury on the lips, which was possibly by bite.3. on a thoughtful consideration of the entire evidence including the evidence of the prosecutrix and the medical evidence, i am of opinion that the allegation of rape is well-proved. the girl is of very tender age and the rape on the girl of such a tender age by an adult of 40 years is most reprehensible and barberic. there is, therefore, no scope for having any leniency or taking liberal view, which if taken; in my view, would tantamount to abatement of such heinous offence which is slur against the society and womanhood as a whole and which deserves most deterrent punishment.4. consequently, the appeal fails and it is hereby dismissed.

Full Judgment

Guman Mal Lodha, J.

1. Magiya has filed this appeal against the judgment dated August 11, 1978 of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Sirohi, by which he convicted the accused-appellant under Section 376, IPC and sentenced him to five years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 200/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment of four months.

2. The prosecutrix Mst. Kasu was only nine years of age when she was ravished by the accused, who is alleged to be of 40 years of age. According to the medical evidence, such injury can be caused by fingering also if the finger has got nails, as there was lacerated wound on posterior fornix of vagina. It was swollen but not ruptured. PW 7 Dr. S.P. Purohit has testified that there was lacerated wound on left side of vagina adjacent to hymen and fresh blood was oozing out. According to the medical evidence, forcible sexual intercourse was committed with the girl within six hours of her medical examination. There was another injury on the lips, which was possibly by bite.

3. On a thoughtful consideration of the entire evidence including the evidence of the prosecutrix and the medical evidence, I am of opinion that the allegation of rape is well-proved. The girl is of very tender age and the rape on the girl of such a tender age by an adult of 40 years is most reprehensible and barberic. There is, therefore, no scope for having any leniency or taking liberal view, which if taken; in my view, would tantamount to abatement of such heinous offence which is slur against the Society and womanhood as a whole and which deserves most deterrent punishment.

4. Consequently, the appeal fails and it is hereby dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial