Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deva Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Deva Ram vs State of Rajasthan and ors.

Disposition Petition dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Apr 13, 2000
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/769487

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1901 of 1993
Subject
Civil
Disposition
Petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution of India - Article 226--Writ--Maintainability--Writ against order passed by Board of Revenue during pendency of suit on application for temporary injunction--Dispute no more survived as the suit itself stood decided--Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.;Writ Petitio...

Key legal issue
Civil
Outcome / disposition
Petition dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deva Ram

Advocate Mr. Purohit

Respondent

State of Rajasthan and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
2000(2)WLN190

Excerpt

constitution of india - article 226--writ--maintainability--writ against order passed by board of revenue during pendency of suit on application for temporary injunction--dispute no more survived as the suit itself stood decided--writ petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.;writ petition dismissed as withdrawn - rajesh balia, j.1. heard learned counsel for the parties.2. the earlier order on 22.4.1993 deciding the writ petition in the absence of the learned counsel for the parties has been recalled by a separate order in d.b. civil misc. application no. 197/99 and, therefore, the petition has once again become live to be heard on merit.3. it has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent that this writ petition has been filed against the order passed by the board of revenue during the pendency of suit on an application for temporary injunction. during the intervening period the suit itself has been decided and therefore the dispute about the interim order which is the subject matter of writ petition no more survives.4. in the aforesaid circumstances mr. purohit learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to his rights to persue remedy against the final order which has been made in proceedings before the revenue court in accordance with law.5. accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to as prayed for. there shall be no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

Rajesh Balia, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The earlier order on 22.4.1993 deciding the writ petition in the absence of the learned Counsel for the parties has been recalled by a separate order in D.B. Civil Misc. Application No. 197/99 and, therefore, the petition has once again become live to be heard on merit.

3. It has been pointed out by the learned Counsel for the respondent that this writ petition has been filed against the order passed by the Board of Revenue during the pendency of suit on an application for temporary injunction. During the intervening period the suit itself has been decided and therefore the dispute about the interim order which is the subject matter of writ petition no more survives.

4. In the aforesaid circumstances Mr. Purohit learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to his rights to persue remedy against the final order which has been made in proceedings before the revenue court in accordance with law.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial