Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anwar Mohd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Anwar Mohd. and ors. vs State of Rajasthan and ors.

Disposition Application dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Aug 21, 1987
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/769049

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Cr. Misc. Application No. 256 of 1982
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Application dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code - Section 406 and Criminal Procedure Code--Protest petition--Police filed final report--Magistrate taking cognizance of offence Under Section 406 on protest petition--Held, there is no illegality to warrant interference.;Petition Dismissed - - He bad powers to disagree with the conclusions of the Invest...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Application dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anwar Mohd. and ors.

Respondent

State of Rajasthan and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
1987WLN(UC)445

Excerpt

penal code - section 406 and criminal procedure code--protest petition--police filed final report--magistrate taking cognizance of offence under section 406 on protest petition--held, there is no illegality to warrant interference.;petition dismissed - - he bad powers to disagree with the conclusions of the investigating officer and to take cognizance of the offence.shyam sunder byas, j.1. heard and perused the record. the police submitted the negative final report in the court of the learned munsif and judicial magistrate, chittorgath. on a protest petition filed by the complainant, the learned magistrate took cognizance of the offence under section 406 ipc against the three accused-petitioners. it was open to the learned magistrate to peruse the case diary and see whether an offence was prima-facie made out against the accused-petitioners or not. he bad powers to disagree with the conclusions of the investigating officer and to take cognizance of the offence. no. illegality has been pointed out in the impugned order by the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. it may be observed that it will be open to the accused-petitioners to put appearance in the court below and contend before him that since no offence has made out, they should be discharged.3. with the above observations, this application under section 482 cr.pc is dismissed.

Full Judgment

Shyam Sunder Byas, J.

1. Heard and perused the record. The police submitted the negative final report in the Court of the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Chittorgath. On a protest petition filed by the complainant, the learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Section 406 IPC against the three accused-petitioners. It was open to the learned Magistrate to peruse the case diary and see whether an offence was prima-facie made out against the accused-petitioners or not. He bad powers to disagree with the conclusions of the Investigating Officer and to take cognizance of the offence. No. illegality has been pointed out in the impugned order by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. It may be observed that it will be open to the accused-petitioners to put appearance in the Court below and contend before him that since no offence has made out, they should be discharged.

3. With the above observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.PC is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial