Randhir Vs. State

Randhir vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Dec 07, 2000

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/769037

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/769037
Court: Rajasthan High Court
Judge: Sunil Kumar Garg, J.
Decided On: Dec 07, 2000
Case Number: S.B. Cri.Misc. Petition No. 659 of 2000 in S.B. Cri. Appeal No. 21 of 1983
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482--Extension of time for compliance of order of High Court--Looking to the facts and circumstances of case further time of 2 months given for compliance of order given by High Court to deposit personal bond and surety.;Misc. Petition Allowed - - 1,000/- and a surety in the...

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Randhir

Respondent

State

Legal References

Reported In: 2002(3)WLN298

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1973 - section 482--extension of time for compliance of order of high court--looking to the facts and circumstances of case further time of 2 months given for compliance of order given by high court to deposit personal bond and surety.;misc. petition allowed - - 1,000/- and a surety in the like amount and also for paying rs. 1,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned additional sessions judge, nohar within a period of two months from today to keep peace and be of good behavior for a period of one year.sunil kumar garg, j.1. heard learned counsel for the parties on the application under section 482 cr.p.c. by which a prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the time granted vide judgment dated 22.9.2000 for depositing personal bond in the sum of rs. 1,000/- and a surety in the like amount and also for paying rs. 2000/- as compensation by each accused petitioners to p.w.2 ramniwas and p.w.9 dharampal be extended.2. it may be stated that this court vide judgment and order dated 22.9.2000 while maintaining the conviction of the petitioners for offences under sections 324, 447, 323/49 and 148 i.p.c. directed the accused petitioners to be released on probation under section 4 of the probation of offenders act, 1958 provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of rs. 1,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned additional sessions judge, nohar within a period of two months from today to keep peace and be of good behavior for a period of one year. it was further directed that each accused petitioner shall pay rs. 2000/- as compensation to pw-2 ramniwas and pw-9 dharampal and for depositing, said amount, three month's time given.3. looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the averments made in the application, the prayer is accepted and two months more time is granted to the present accused petitioners, namely, randhir and munshi ram to comply with the directions contained in judgment and order dated 22.9.2000 passed by this court in s.b. criminal appeal no. 21/83.4. the application under section 482 cr. p.c. stands disposed of accordingly.

Full Judgment

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties on the application Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by which a prayer has been made by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that the time granted vide judgment dated 22.9.2000 for depositing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,000/- and a surety in the like amount and also for paying Rs. 2000/- as compensation by each accused petitioners to P.W.2 Ramniwas and P.W.9 Dharampal be extended.

2. It may be stated that this Court vide judgment and order dated 22.9.2000 while maintaining the conviction of the petitioners for offences Under Sections 324, 447, 323/49 and 148 I.P.C. directed the accused petitioners to be released on probation Under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nohar within a period of two months from today to keep peace and be of good behavior for a period of one year. It was further directed that each accused petitioner shall pay Rs. 2000/- as compensation to PW-2 Ramniwas and PW-9 Dharampal and for depositing, said amount, three month's time given.

3. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the averments made in the application, the prayer is accepted and two months more time is granted to the present accused petitioners, namely, Randhir and Munshi Ram to comply with the directions contained in judgment and order dated 22.9.2000 passed by this court in S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 21/83.

4. The application Under Section 482 Cr. P.C. stands disposed of accordingly.

Same Court & Year Rajasthan · 2000 Same Parties Randhir vs State Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Sunil Kumar Garg, J.

Criminal