Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nisar Mohammed Vs. State of Rajasthan

Nisar Mohammed vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Apr 22, 1985
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/769000

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 589 of 1985
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code - Section 376 and Criminal Procedure Code--Section 437--Bail Accused denying commission of offence--Accused be got identified by prosecutrix--Accused to report before CJM who shall send him to judicial custody--Accused not to be handcuffed--Held, he be released on bail if not identified;Order Accordingly....

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nisar Mohammed

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1985WLN(UC)332

Excerpt

penal code - section 376 and criminal procedure code--section 437--bail accused denying commission of offence--accused be got identified by prosecutrix--accused to report before cjm who shall send him to judicial custody--accused not to be handcuffed--held, he be released on bail if not identified;order accordingly. - - the an innocent person is not made an accused by prior showing to the prosecutrix in police custody and therefore i deem it proper, in the interest of justice, that accused shall report before the chief judicial magistrate who will forward him to judicial custody on the same day and will depute a magistrate to hold the test identification parade on that very day, for that a date for surrendering may be intimated well in advance which shall not be later than 15 days, and will ensure that the accused is not taken to the police station and is not hand cuffed prior to test identification parade. 5000/- and a like surety to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, jhalawar.vinod shanker dave, j.1. heard learned counsel for the parties. a serious dispute about the identification of the accused has been raised in this case and it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not the one who has committed rape with the prosecutrix. it has rightly been observed by the learned sessions judge that this will be a question to be decided at the time of investigation, but at the same time all care and protection has to be taken that accused should be got identified by the prosecutrix, if she can. the an innocent person is not made an accused by prior showing to the prosecutrix in police custody and therefore i deem it proper, in the interest of justice, that accused shall report before the chief judicial magistrate who will forward him to judicial custody on the same day and will depute a magistrate to hold the test identification parade on that very day, for that a date for surrendering may be intimated well in advance which shall not be later than 15 days, and will ensure that the accused is not taken to the police station and is not hand cuffed prior to test identification parade. in case the accused is identified it will be open to the investigating officer to obtain his police custody but in case he is not identified correctly then he shall be released forthwith on bail on execution of a personal bond for a sum of rs. 5000/- and a like surety to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, jhalawar.2. copy of this order be sent to the chief judicial magistrate, jhalawar and also the superintendent, jhalawar for compliance.3. with the above observations the bail application is disposed of.

Full Judgment

Vinod Shanker Dave, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. A serious dispute about the identification of the accused has been raised in this case and it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not the one who has committed rape with the prosecutrix. It has rightly been observed by the learned Sessions Judge that this will be a question to be decided at the time of investigation, but at the same time all care and protection has to be taken that accused should be got identified by the prosecutrix, if she can. The an innocent person is not made an accused by prior showing to the prosecutrix in police custody and therefore I deem it proper, in the interest of justice, that accused shall report before the Chief Judicial Magistrate who will forward him to judicial custody on the same day and will depute a Magistrate to hold the test identification parade on that very day, for that a date for surrendering may be intimated well in advance which shall not be later than 15 days, and will ensure that the accused is not taken to the police station and is not hand cuffed prior to test identification parade. In case the accused is identified it will be open to the Investigating Officer to obtain his police custody but in case he is not identified correctly then he shall be released forthwith on bail on execution of a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 5000/- and a like surety to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhalawar.

2. Copy of this order be sent to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhalawar and also the Superintendent, Jhalawar for compliance.

3. With the above observations the bail application is disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial