Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Baldeo Singh Vs. State

Baldeo Singh vs State

Disposition Application allowed Court Rajasthan Decided May 13, 1985
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/767773

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Cr. Misc. Transfer Application No. 414/1985
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Transfer Petition--Incident relates to Rly. Station Jodhewala in Sriganganagar Sessions Division--Held, case deserves to be transferred to Sessions Court Sriganganagar from Sessions Court, Bikaner;The case deserves to be tried by the Court of the Sessions Judge, Srigangangar in as much as i...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Application allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Baldeo Singh

Respondent

State

Legal References

Cases Referred
State v. Jagdish
Reported In
1985WLN(UC)77

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - transfer petition--incident relates to rly. station jodhewala in sriganganagar sessions division--held, case deserves to be transferred to sessions court sriganganagar from sessions court, bikaner;the case deserves to be tried by the court of the sessions judge, srigangangar in as much as it relates to an incident at the railway station, jodhewala, which is under the sessions division ganganagar;application accepted - k.s. lodha, j.1. these two cases arise out of the same circumstances and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order.2. these are two applications for transfer of two sessions cases pending before the learned sessions judge bikaner to the court of sessions at ganganagar3. the learned p.p. has accepted notices of the applications. i have heard the learned counsel for both the parties.4. i need not state the facts of the case at any length because in my opinion, in view of the decision of this court in s.b. criminal reference no. 2/84 state v. jagdish decided on 15-4 85, the cases deserve to be tried by the court of the sessions judge, sriganganagar in as much as it relates to an incident at the railway station, jodhewala, which is under the sessions division ganganagar. the case was committed to the court of sessions judge bikaner by railway magistrate, bikaner because his court was situated within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the learned sessions judge, bikaner. in view of the aforesaid decision the learned p.p. also has no objection to the cases being transferred to the court of the learned sessions judge, sriganganagar.5. i, therefore, accept these two applications and direct that the sessions cases no. 9/85 and 10/85 pending before the learned sessions judge bikaner be transferred to the court of the learned sessions judge, sri ganganagar the accused-petitioners in both the cases are directed to appear before the learned sessions judge, sriganganagar on 3-6-85. copies of the orders may be sent to both the sessions judges.

Full Judgment

K.S. Lodha, J.

1. These two cases arise out of the same circumstances and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order.

2. These are two applications for transfer of two sessions cases pending before the learned Sessions Judge Bikaner to the Court of Sessions at Ganganagar

3. The learned P.P. has accepted notices of the applications. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties.

4. I need not state the facts of the case at any length because in my opinion, in view of the decision of this Court in S.B. Criminal Reference No. 2/84 State v. Jagdish decided on 15-4 85, the cases deserve to be tried by the Court of the Sessions Judge, Sriganganagar in as much as it relates to an incident at the Railway Station, Jodhewala, which is under the sessions division Ganganagar. The case was committed to the Court of Sessions Judge Bikaner by Railway Magistrate, Bikaner because his court was situated within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the learned Sessions Judge, Bikaner. In view of the aforesaid decision the learned P.P. also has no objection to the cases being transferred to the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Sriganganagar.

5. I, therefore, accept these two applications and direct that the Sessions Cases No. 9/85 and 10/85 pending before the learned Sessions Judge Bikaner be transferred to the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Sri ganganagar The accused-petitioners in both the cases are directed to appear before the learned Sessions Judge, Sriganganagar on 3-6-85. Copies of the orders may be sent to both the Sessions Judges.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial