Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bega Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Bega Ram vs State of Rajasthan

Disposition Application allowed Court Rajasthan Decided Sep 26, 2007
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/767480

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Family;Criminal
Disposition
Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - 3. have considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also perused the evidence on record filed along with the challan which has been submitted on 16th of June, 2007. 4. Without expressling any opinion on the merits of the case and taking into consideration the nature of allegation as well as the age of...

Key legal issue
Family;Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Application allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bega Ram

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
I(2008)DMC159

Excerpt

- - 3. have considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also perused the evidence on record filed along with the challan which has been submitted on 16th of june, 2007. 4. without expressling any opinion on the merits of the case and taking into consideration the nature of allegation as well as the age of the petitioner, i deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail under section 439, cr.orderraghuvendra s. rathore, j.1. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor for state and also perused the material on record.2. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the father-in-law, against whom general allegations have been levelled. he further submits that as per the prosecution case the main allegation is against the husband namely, surjaram. further, he has submitted that the petitioner is an old man of 70 years of age. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mother-in-law bidami devi has already been enlarged on bail and the case of the petitioner is on similar footing.learned public prosecutor has opposed the bail application.3. have considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also perused the evidence on record filed along with the challan which has been submitted on 16th of june, 2007.4. without expressling any opinion on the merits of the case and taking into consideration the nature of allegation as well as the age of the petitioner, i deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail under section 439, cr.p.c.5. it is ordered that the accused-petitioner bega ram s/o sukhdeva ram in fir no. 45 of 2007, police station, sadar, sikar, shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond of rs. 50,000 and two surety bonds of rs. 25,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Raghuvendra S. Rathore, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for State and also perused the material on record.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the father-in-law, against whom general allegations have been levelled. He further submits that as per the prosecution case the main allegation is against the husband namely, Surjaram. Further, he has submitted that the petitioner is an old man of 70 years of age. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the mother-in-law Bidami Devi has already been enlarged on bail and the case of the petitioner is on similar footing.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

3. have considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also perused the evidence on record filed along with the challan which has been submitted on 16th of June, 2007.

4. Without expressling any opinion on the merits of the case and taking into consideration the nature of allegation as well as the age of the petitioner, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail under Section 439, Cr.P.C.

5. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Bega Ram s/o Sukhdeva Ram in FIR No. 45 of 2007, Police Station, Sadar, Sikar, shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two surety bonds of Rs. 25,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial