Sardara Vs. State of Rajasthan

penal code - section 412--sentence--accused in custody for about 4 years--held, ends of justice would meet if sentence is reduced to already undergone.; the accused appellant has remained in custody for a total period of about 4 years.; the ends of justice in the case will be met if the sentence of rigorous imprisonment awarded by the learned trial court is reduced to the period already undergone.; appeal partly allowed - .....years and three months and a fine of rs. 250/-the accused appellant was convicted along with two other accused persons, but this appeal relates only to the accused appellant, sardara. the accused appellant was, however, acquitted of the offences under section 459, 460, 395, 396 and 397, i.p.c.2. against this conviction and sentence of the appellant, this appeal has been preferred.3. i have heard the arguments of both the learned counsel.4. the learned counsel for the appellant has stated at bar before me that he does not challenge the conviction of the appellant for the offence under section 412, ipc, but he has prayed for the leniency in the sentence.5. the learned public prosecutor has expressed no objection in taking the lenient view so far as the sentence is concerned.6. it the case of amor singh and ors. v. state of madhya pradesh air 1982 sc 129, the supreme court has reduced the sentence from four years to two years rigorous imprisonment for the offence under section 412, ipc.7. the learned public prosecutor after going through the record of the learned trial court has stated at bar that the accused appellant has remained in custody for a total period of about 4 years.8. having regard to the above authority of the supreme court, i think the ends of justice in the case will be met if the sentence of rigorous imprisonment awarded by the learned trial court is reduced to the period already undergone. however, the sentence of fine should be maintained.9. in the result, this appeal is party allowed. the conviction of the accused appellant for the offence under section 412, ipc is upheld and maintained. the sentence of imprisonment awarded by the learned trial court in reduced to the imprisonment for the period already undergone. the sentence of fine awarded by the learned trial court is maintained. in default of payment of fine, the accused appellant will undergo a further rigorous imprisonment for the period as already awarded by the learned trial court.