Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Atal Construction Co. and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Atal Construction Co. and ors. vs Union of India and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Feb 13, 1998
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/767163

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Civil Writ Petn. No. 1232 of 1997 13 February 1998
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Counsels: R.A. Katta, for the Petitioner Anant Kasliwal, for the Respondents Head Note: INCOME TAX Business income--UNDER SECTION 44ADValidity of Circular No. 737 dt. 23-2-1996 Catch Note: As Circular No. 737 dt. 23-2-1996 issued by CBDT is quashed notice issued to petitioner in pursuance of that circular is also ...

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Atal Construction Co. and ors.

Advocate R.A. Katta, <i>for the Petitioner </i>Anant Kasliwal, <i>for the Respondents</i>

Respondent

Union of India and ors.

Legal References

Cases Referred
A.S. Construction Co. v. Union of India
Reported In
(2001)165CTR(Raj)125

Excerpt

counsels: r.a. katta, for the petitioner anant kasliwal, for the respondents head note: income tax business income--under section 44advalidity of circular no. 737 dt. 23-2-1996 catch note: as circular no. 737 dt. 23-2-1996 issued by cbdt is quashed notice issued to petitioner in pursuance of that circular is also quashed and assessing authority is directed to drop the proceeding and start fresh proceeding as per amendment introduced in the year 1997 in proviso to sub-section (2) of section 44ad of the income tax act. application: also to current assessment year. decision: in favour of assessee. income tax act 1961 s.44ad in the rajasthan high court g.s. misra, j. - orderby the courtthe petitioner has moved this court for quashing the notice dated 15-11-1996, which had been issued to the petitioner initiating a proceeding in pursuance of the circular no. 737, dated 23-2-1996, issued by the central board of direct taxes respondent no. 2 herein. it is not necessary to enter into the grounds for such challenge as the said circular already stands quashed by a co-ordinate bench at principal seat, jodhpur, which is reported in a.s. construction co. v. union of india & anr. (198) 5 dtc 523 (raj-hc) : (1998) 144 ctr (raj) 69 in s.b. civil writ petition no. 642 of 1997, i see no reason to take a different view from the order passed earlier.accordingly, the impugned notice as contained in annexure stands quashed and the assessing authority is directed to drop the proceeding and start fresh proceeding as per amendment introduced in the year 1997 in proviso to sub-section (2) of section 44ad of the income tax act.the writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

ORDER

By the Court

The petitioner has moved this court for quashing the notice dated 15-11-1996, which had been issued to the petitioner initiating a proceeding in pursuance of the Circular No. 737, dated 23-2-1996, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes respondent No. 2 herein. It is not necessary to enter into the grounds for such challenge as the said circular already stands quashed by a co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, which is reported in A.S. Construction Co. v. Union of India & Anr. (198) 5 DTC 523 (Raj-HC) : (1998) 144 CTR (Raj) 69 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 642 of 1997, I see no reason to take a different view from the order passed earlier.

Accordingly, the impugned notice as contained in Annexure stands quashed and the Assessing Authority is directed to drop the proceeding and start fresh proceeding as per amendment introduced in the year 1997 in proviso to sub-section (2) of section 44AD of the Income Tax Act.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial