Mst. Teeju Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan

Mst. Teeju Devi vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Mar 28, 1995

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/767138

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/767138
Court: Rajasthan High Court
Judge: N.L. Tibrewal, J.
Decided On: Mar 28, 1995
Case Number: S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1372 of 1995
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Section 438--Anticipatory bail--Petitioner woman--Given birth to chid on 2.1.1995--Two persons assignedone head injury--Held, she be released on bail in event of arrest;The petitioner is a women and she has given birth to a child on 2nd February, 1995. It is also contended that two persons ...

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mst. Teeju Devi

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In: 1995(1)WLN614

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - section 438--anticipatory bail--petitioner woman--given birth to chid on 2.1.1995--two persons assignedone head injury--held, she be released on bail in event of arrest;the petitioner is a women and she has given birth to a child on 2nd february, 1995. it is also contended that two persons have been assigned one injury on the head of nauranglal;in the event of arrest of the petitioner mst. teeju devi w/o chaina ram she shall be released on bail;bail granted - - 1. heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned public prosecutor for the state of rajasthan and also perused the documents on record. 5000/- (rupees five thousand) with one surety in the like amount sum of rs.n.l. tibrewal, j.1. heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned public prosecutor for the state of rajasthan and also perused the documents on record.2. the petitioner is a women and she has given birth to a child on 2nd february, 1995. it is also contended that two persons have been assigned one injury on the head of nauranglal.for the reasons stated above, i am inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the potitioner under section 438 cr.pc.3. taking into consideration all the facts & circumstances of the case, i think it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner under section 438 cr.pc.4. the sho/arresting officer/investigating officer, police station laxmangarh in fir no. 49/95 is, therefore, directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner mst. teeju devi w/o chaina ram she shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of rs. 5000/- (rupees five thousand) with one surety in the like amount sum of rs..../ each, to the satisfaction of the sho concerned, on the following conditions:(i) that the petitioner/s shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make, any inducement, threat or promise to any person a quainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the court, or any police officer; and.(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave india without the previous permission of the court.

Full Judgment

N.L. Tibrewal, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Rajasthan and also perused the documents on record.

2. The petitioner is a women and she has given birth to a child on 2nd February, 1995. It is also contended that two persons have been assigned one injury on the head of Nauranglal.

For the reasons stated above, I am inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the potitioner Under Section 438 Cr.PC.

3. Taking into consideration all the facts & circumstances of the case, I think it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner Under Section 438 Cr.PC.

4. The SHO/Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer, Police Station Laxmangarh in FIR No. 49/95 is, therefore, directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Mst. Teeju Devi W/o Chaina Ram she shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees five thousand) with one surety in the like amount sum of Rs..../ each, to the satisfaction of the SHO concerned, on the following conditions:

(i) that the petitioner/s shall make herself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make, any inducement, threat or promise to any person a quainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court, or any Police Officer; and.

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

Same Court & Year Rajasthan · 1995 Same Parties Mst. Teeju Devi vs State of Rajasthan Same Subject Criminal Same Judge N.L. Tibrewal, J.

Criminal