Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lichman Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Lichman Ram vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Oct 28, 1999
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/766870

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Criminal Revision Pett No. 484 of 1999
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 323, 324, 326, 452--Sentence--Offences committed more than eight years back--Sentence awarded upto two years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500--Same converted into a fine of Rs. 10,000 to be paid to complainant if deposited within two weeks.;Revision Disposed Of -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lichman Ram

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
2000(2)WLN374

Excerpt

penal code, 1860 - sections 323, 324, 326, 452--sentence--offences committed more than eight years back--sentence awarded upto two years rigorous imprisonment and fine of rs. 500--same converted into a fine of rs. 10,000 to be paid to complainant if deposited within two weeks.;revision disposed of - bhagwati prasad, j.1. counsel for the petitioner does not press the revision so far as it relates to the conviction. he pleads that if the hon'ble court deems it proper, then the accused appellant may be ordered to pay compensation to the injured complainant. the learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the accused has already served out most part of his sentence and in this view of the matter, it would not be appropriate if the accused serves complete jail sentence.2. the learned p.p. though does not agree on this proposition that the sentence of jail should be converted into sentence of fine, but he considers that it would not be appropriate to serve the complete sentence after 8 years.3. looking to all the facts and circumstances of the case, it is ordered that in case, accused petitioner deposits a sum of rs. 10,000/- to be paid to the injured complainant, the substantive sentence awarded to the accused petitioner will be deemed to have been converted into the sentence of fine and he will be released forthwith. if the amount is not deposited within two weeks the trial court may remand the accused to jail to serve out the sentence awarded to him. the revision is accordingly disposed of.

Full Judgment

Bhagwati prasad, J.

1. Counsel for the petitioner does not press the revision so far as it relates to the conviction. He pleads that if the Hon'ble Court deems it proper, then the accused appellant may be ordered to pay compensation to the injured complainant. The learned Counsel for the petitioner also submits that the accused has already served out most part of his sentence and in this view of the matter, it would not be appropriate if the accused serves complete jail sentence.

2. The learned P.P. though does not agree on this proposition that the sentence of jail should be converted into sentence of fine, but he considers that it would not be appropriate to serve the complete sentence after 8 years.

3. Looking to all the facts and circumstances of the case, it is ordered that in case, accused petitioner deposits a sum of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid to the injured complainant, the substantive sentence awarded to the accused petitioner will be deemed to have been converted into the sentence of fine and he will be released forthwith. If the amount is not deposited within two weeks the trial court may remand the accused to jail to serve out the sentence awarded to him. The revision is accordingly disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial