Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

NaraIn Lal Vs. the State of Rajasthan

NaraIn Lal vs The State of Rajasthan

Disposition Petition allowed Court Rajasthan Decided Sep 05, 1991
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/766372

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Cr. Writ Petition No. 699 of 1984
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution of India - Articles 226, 14 and 16 and Penal Cote--Sections 147/149, 323 and 302--Services terminated on account of conviction in criminal case--Petitioner subsequently acquitted--Held, he is entitled to be reinstated forth with in service with full back wages and all consequential benefits with in 4 mo...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Petition allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

NaraIn Lal

Respondent

The State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1991(2)WLN394

Excerpt

constitution of india - articles 226, 14 and 16 and penal cote--sections 147/149, 323 and 302--services terminated on account of conviction in criminal case--petitioner subsequently acquitted--held, he is entitled to be reinstated forth with in service with full back wages and all consequential benefits with in 4 months.;it is evident from bare reading of anx. 5 that the services of the petitioner were terminated on account of conviction by a criminal court vide order dated january 5, 1982. since he has been acquitted by this court as stated above, it is directed that he should be reinstated on his job forthwith. he is entitled to be reinstated with all consequential benefits. he shall also be entitled to full back wages. this shall be done within a period of 4 months.;writ allowed - inder sen israni, j.1. it is submitted by shri g.l. pareek, learned counsel that petitioner was working as constable and was posted at sawaimadhopur. he was suspended on february 3, 1981 as a criminal case under sections 147/149, 323 and 302 i.p.c. was filed against him by way of private complaint. the petitioner was convicted under sections 323, 149 i.p.c. by order of learned additional district & sessions judge, gangapur passed on january 5, 1982. thereafter, the services of the petitioner were terminated on december 27, 1983 vide annexure-5, the petitioner preferred appeal in this court, in which, he was acquitted by order dated march 11, 1991. a copy of the order has been placed on record. it is, therefore, submitted by learned counsel that since the petitioner was terminated as he was convicted by the court of additional district & sessions judge as is evident from. annexure-5, he is entitled to be re-instated now since he has been acquitted by hon'ble high court.2. i have heard both the parties and gone through the document on record. it is evident from bare reading of anx. 5 that the services of the petitioner were terminated on account of conviction by a criminal court vide order dated january 5, 1982. since he has been acquitted by this court as stated above, it is directed that he should be reinstated on his job forthwith. he is entitled to be reinstated with all consequential benefits. he shall also be entitled to full back wages. this shall be done within a period of 4 months, from the date of producing copy of this order before concerned authority.3. the writ petition is allowed as above, with no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

Inder Sen Israni, J.

1. It is submitted by Shri G.L. Pareek, learned Counsel that petitioner was working as Constable and was posted at Sawaimadhopur. He was suspended on February 3, 1981 as a criminal case under Sections 147/149, 323 and 302 I.P.C. was filed against him by way of private complaint. The petitioner was convicted under Sections 323, 149 I.P.C. by order of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gangapur passed on January 5, 1982. Thereafter, the services of the petitioner were terminated on December 27, 1983 vide Annexure-5, The petitioner preferred appeal in this Court, in which, he was acquitted by order dated March 11, 1991. A copy of the order has been placed on record. It is, therefore, submitted by learned Counsel that since the petitioner was terminated as he was convicted by the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge as is evident from. Annexure-5, he is entitled to be re-instated now since he has been acquitted by Hon'ble High Court.

2. I have heard both the parties and gone through the document on record. It is evident from bare reading of Anx. 5 that the services of the petitioner were terminated on account of conviction by a criminal court vide order dated January 5, 1982. Since he has been acquitted by this Court as stated above, it is directed that he should be reinstated on his job forthwith. He is entitled to be reinstated with all consequential benefits. He shall also be entitled to full back wages. This shall be done within a period of 4 months, from the date of producing copy of this order before concerned authority.

3. The writ petition is allowed as above, with no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial