Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rewad Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Rewad vs State of Rajasthan and ors.

Disposition Petition allowed Court Rajasthan Decided Oct 23, 1986
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/765686

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 122 of 1986
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Sections 145 & 107--Injunction of Revenue Court--R still apprehended blood-shed--Held, proceedings under Section 145 be converted into under Section 107.;Order Accordingly - - 4. In these circumstances since Kalu apprehension is that Rewad and a others by their muscle strength would l...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Petition allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rewad

Respondent

State of Rajasthan and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
1987(2)WLN727

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - sections 145 & 107--injunction of revenue court--r still apprehended blood-shed--held, proceedings under section 145 be converted into under section 107.;order accordingly - - 4. in these circumstances since kalu apprehension is that rewad and a others by their muscle strength would like to have blood shed and break bones of rewad and others, the appropriate proceedings can be under section 107 cr.guman mal lodha, j.1. rewad and kalu are having litigation for allotment of agricultural land. this suit is pending before the acm no. 1, jaipur where application for appointment of receiver is also pending. in the civil court an injunction has already been issued in favour of kalu and others restraining rewad and others from disturbing possession of this land.2. after hearing learned counsel for the parties i am of the opinion that when kalu has got injunction in his favour from a regular revenue court, the proceedings under section 145 cr. p.c. launched thereafter are mis-conceived. if rewad and others committed breach of injunction they can be punished for contempt of court.3. kalu and others respondent no. 2 therefore having held to be in possession prima facie by revenue court, no proceedings under section 145 cr. p.c. can be taken for making an enquiry as to who was in possession on the date of dispute.4. in these circumstances since kalu apprehension is that rewad and a others by their muscle strength would like to have blood shed and break bones of rewad and others, the appropriate proceedings can be under section 107 cr. p.c. read with section 116 cr. p.c.5. consequently i accept miscellaneous application of rewad. instead of quashing the proceedings under section 145 cr. p.c. as a whole i direct that in the interest of justice for ensuring peace the magistrate concerned should convert these proceedings under section 107 cr. p.c. against rewad and others and drop the proceedings under section 145 cr. p.c.6. the petition is accepted as indicated above.

Full Judgment

Guman Mal Lodha, J.

1. Rewad and Kalu are having litigation for allotment of agricultural land. This suit is pending before the ACM No. 1, Jaipur where application for appointment of receiver is also pending. In the civil court an injunction has already been issued in favour of Kalu and others restraining Rewad and others from disturbing possession of this land.

2. After hearing learned Counsel for the parties I am of the opinion that when Kalu has got injunction in his favour from a regular revenue court, the proceedings under Section 145 Cr. P.C. launched thereafter are mis-conceived. If Rewad and others committed breach of injunction they can be punished for contempt of court.

3. Kalu and others respondent No. 2 therefore having held to be in possession prima facie by revenue court, no proceedings under Section 145 Cr. P.C. can be taken for making an enquiry as to who was in possession on the date of dispute.

4. In these circumstances since Kalu apprehension is that Rewad and a others by their muscle strength would like to have blood shed and break bones of Rewad and others, the appropriate proceedings can be under Section 107 Cr. P.C. read with Section 116 Cr. P.C.

5. Consequently I accept miscellaneous application of Rewad. Instead of quashing the proceedings under Section 145 Cr. P.C. as a whole I direct that in the interest of justice for ensuring peace the Magistrate concerned should convert these proceedings under Section 107 Cr. P.C. against Rewad and others and drop the proceedings under Section 145 Cr. P.C.

6. The petition is accepted as indicated above.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial