Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Komal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Komal Singh vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Jul 24, 1995
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/765198

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2877 of 1995
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code - Sections 304B and 201 and Criminal Procedure Code--Section 439--Bail--Petitioner father-in-law of deceased--In custody since 8.6.1995--Petitioner 70 yrs. old--No further investigation is required--Husband of deceased in jail--Held, accused be released on bail.;Petitioner is father-in-law of deceased and...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Komal Singh

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1995(2)WLN404

Excerpt

penal code - sections 304b and 201 and criminal procedure code--section 439--bail--petitioner father-in-law of deceased--in custody since 8.6.1995--petitioner 70 yrs. old--no further investigation is required--husband of deceased in jail--held, accused be released on bail.;petitioner is father-in-law of deceased and he is in custody since 8.6.95 he is about 70 years of age no further investigation is required from lim. the husband of the deceased is already in jail.;i am inclined to grant bail under section 439 cr. p.c. to the accused petitioner.;bail granted - y.r. meena, j.1. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned public prosecutor for the state and also perused the documents on record. it has been submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of deceased and he is in. custody since 8.6.95 he is about 70 years of age. no further investigation is required from. the husband of the deceased is already in jail.2. in the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by both the sides, i am inclined to grant bail under section 439 cr. p.c. to the accused petitioner.3. it is therefore, ordered that the accused petitioners komal singh s/o raj ram shall be released on bail provided he of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of rs. 40,000 (rupees forty thousand) with two sureties in the amount of rs. 20,000 each, to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation to appear in that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial against him in this case.

Full Judgment

Y.R. Meena, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor for the State and also perused the documents on record. It has been submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of deceased and he is in. custody since 8.6.95 He is about 70 years of age. No further investigation is required from. The husband of the deceased is already in jail.

2. In the Facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by both the sides, I am inclined to grant bail under Section 439 Cr. P.C. to the accused petitioner.

3. It is therefore, ordered that the accused petitioners Komal Singh S/o Raj Ram shall be released on bail provided he of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 40,000 (Rupees forty thousand) with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 20,000 each, to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation to appear in that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial against him in this case.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial