Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sawai Singh Vs. State of Raj.

Sawai Singh vs State of Raj.

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Feb 22, 1991
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/765126

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Cr. Appeal No. 418 of 1980
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Probation of Offender Act, 1958 - Probation--Benefit of--Age, character and antecedents of accused considered--Held, accused are entitled to benefit of probation.;Appeal Partly Allowed. - - He merely submits that while maintaining the conviction of the appellants they may be extended the benefit of Probation of Of...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sawai Singh

Respondent

State of Raj.

Legal References

Reported In
1991WLN(UC)554

Excerpt

probation of offender act, 1958 - probation--benefit of--age, character and antecedents of accused considered--held, accused are entitled to benefit of probation.;appeal partly allowed. - - he merely submits that while maintaining the conviction of the appellants they may be extended the benefit of probation of offender's act because the learned trial court failed to consider this point. 5,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, jaipur with this condition that they will maintain peace and be of good behaviour for a period of one year.farooq hassan, j.1. heard learned counsel for the parties. the counsel for the appellants submits that he does not want to assail the finding of the learned trial court on merits. he merely submits that while maintaining the conviction of the appellants they may be extended the benefit of probation of offender's act because the learned trial court failed to consider this point. a look at the record shows that the present case is fully covered by the principles laid down in the case reported in 1979 supreme court 934. so looking to the age, character and antecedents of the appellants they are entitled to be released on probation.2. this appeal is therefore, partly allowed. the conviction of the appellants is maintained but instead of passing any sentence against them they are directed to be released on probation provided each of then furnishes a personal bond in a sum of rs. 5,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, jaipur with this condition that they will maintain peace and be of good behaviour for a period of one year. the said bonds are to be furnished within a period of two months failing to which the appellants shall serve out the sentence passed against them.

Full Judgment

Farooq Hassan, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The counsel for the appellants submits that he does not want to assail the finding of the learned trial court on merits. He merely submits that while maintaining the conviction of the appellants they may be extended the benefit of Probation of Offender's Act because the learned trial court failed to consider this point. A look at the record shows that the present case is fully covered by the principles laid down in the case reported in 1979 Supreme Court 934. So looking to the age, character and antecedents of the appellants they are entitled to be released on probation.

2. This appeal is therefore, partly allowed. The conviction of the appellants is maintained but instead of passing any sentence against them they are directed to be released on probation provided each of then furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 5,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaipur with this condition that they will maintain peace and be of good behaviour for a period of one year. The said bonds are to be furnished within a period of two months failing to which the appellants shall serve out the sentence passed against them.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial