Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kajod Vs. State of Rajasthan

Kajod vs State of Rajasthan

Disposition Application allowed Court Rajasthan Decided Nov 24, 1988
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/764252

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail No. 2940 of 1988
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Section 439--Bail--Prosecutrix consenting party--Conflicting evidence about her age--Held, bail is granted.;Bail Granted - - 5,000/-(Rupees five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court as and...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Application allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kajod

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Cases Referred
Vardarajan v. State of Madras
Reported In
1988WLN(UC)287

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - section 439--bail--prosecutrix consenting party--conflicting evidence about her age--held, bail is granted.;bail granted - - 5,000/-(rupees five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial of this case.vinod shanker dave, j.1. it appears from the order of the learned sessions judge, that the prosecutrix was the consenting party. regarding the question of age, though that will be determined at the time of trial yet there is conflicting evidence and atleast it is certain that she has attained the age of discretion as is held by their lordships of the supreme court in vardarajan v. state of madras : 1965 crilj33 . in these circumstances, i am inclined to grant bail.2. the petitioner shall be released on bail provided he executes a bail bond in the sum of rs. 5,000/-(rupees five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial of this case.

Full Judgment

Vinod Shanker Dave, J.

1. It appears from the order of the learned Sessions Judge, that the prosecutrix was the consenting party. Regarding the question of age, though that will be determined at the time of trial yet there is conflicting evidence and atleast it is certain that she has attained the age of discretion as is held by their Lordships of the Supreme Court in Vardarajan v. State of Madras : 1965 CriLJ33 . In these circumstances, I am inclined to grant bail.

2. The petitioner shall be released on bail provided he executes a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000/-(Rupees five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial of this case.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial