Nathu Vs. State of Rajasthan

Nathu vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Dec 05, 1988

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/763853

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/763853
Court: Rajasthan High Court
Judge: Kishore Singh Lodha and; Ranvir Shaya Verma, JJ.
Decided On: Dec 05, 1988
Case Number: D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Habeas Corpus) No. 3212 of 1988
Subject: Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution of India - Article 226--Habeas Corpus--Matter ripe for consideration by Advisory Board in next meeting--Government is directed to dispose of matter within six weeks after receiving recommendation of Advisory Board.;Writ Partly Accepted -

Key legal issue: Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nathu

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In: 1988WLN(UC)252

Excerpt

constitution of india - article 226--habeas corpus--matter ripe for consideration by advisory board in next meeting--government is directed to dispose of matter within six weeks after receiving recommendation of advisory board.;writ partly accepted - 1. a reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents. it is admitted in the reply that the matter of the petitioner has become ripe for consideration by the advisory board and it is also further stated that his matter will be placed in the next meeting of the advisory board which is to be held in january 1989. the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, urged that even if the matter is placed before the advisory board and board makes a recommendation the government may take unduly long time for final disposal of the matter.2. in these circumstances, the writ petition is partly accepted and it it directed that the matter of the petitioner may be placed before the advisory board in the next meeting which is to be held in january, 1989 and thereafter the state government shall finally disposed of the matter after receiving the recommendation of the advisory board within six weeks from the date of receipt of the recommendation.

Full Judgment

1. A reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents. It is admitted in the reply that the matter of the petitioner has become ripe for consideration by the Advisory Board and it is also further stated that his matter will be placed in the next meeting of the Advisory Board which is to be held in January 1989. The learned Counsel for the petitioner, however, urged that even if the matter is placed before the Advisory Board and Board makes a recommendation the Government may take unduly long time for final disposal of the matter.

2. In these circumstances, the writ petition is partly accepted and it it directed that the matter of the petitioner may be placed before the Advisory Board in the next meeting which is to be held in January, 1989 and thereafter the State Government shall finally disposed of the matter after receiving the recommendation of the advisory Board within six weeks from the date of receipt of the recommendation.

Same Court & Year Rajasthan · 1988 Same Parties Nathu vs State of Rajasthan Same Subject Civil Same Judge Kishore Singh Lodha and; Ranvir Shaya Verma, JJ.

Civil