Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

H HusaIn and ors. Vs. State

H HusaIn and ors. vs State

Disposition Application allowed Court Rajasthan Decided Jan 07, 1994
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/763630

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Misc Bail Application No 3 of 1994
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code - Sections 147, 325, 307, 451 & 171 and Criminal Procedure Code -Sec 323 & 439--Bail--Six accused alleged to have caused minor injuries--Author not known--Held, it is too risky to attract Section 147 with intention of causing death and (ii) it is not case for calling case diary--Held, court is inc...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Application allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

H HusaIn and ors.

Respondent

State

Legal References

Reported In
1994(1)WLN237

Excerpt

penal code - sections 147, 325, 307, 451 & 171 and criminal procedure code -sec 323 & 439--bail--six accused alleged to have caused minor injuries--author not known--held, it is too risky to attract section 147 with intention of causing death and (ii) it is not case for calling case diary--held, court is inclined to grant bail;the author of this injury is not known. with the aforesaid minor injuries on the person of the injured it would be too risky and rather venturesome to attract section 147 with the intention of causing death as if the man would have died the case would have resulted in murder;i regret that this is not a case where time may be granted for sending for the case diary as it is a case where six accused persons have been alleged to have committed offences under sections 147, 325, 307, 451 and 171, i.p.c.;i am inclined to grant bail under section 439, cr.p.c. to the accused petitioners.;bail granted - - 2,000/- and one surety bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned sessions judge, jaisalmer for appearance before him as and when called upon to do so.v.s. dave, j.1. the learned public prosecutor wants to call for the case diary. i regret that this is not a case where time may be granted for sending for the case diary as it is a case where six accused persons have been alleged to have committed offences under sections 147, 325, 307, 451 and 171, i.p.c. a perusal of the injury report discloses two contusions whose dimensions are not more than 3 cm in any case, one abrasion 1 1/2 cm and complaining of chest pain which of course is due to fracture of the ribs. the author of this injury is not known. with the aforesaid minor injuries on the person of the injured it would be too risky and rather venture some to attract section 147 with the intention of causing death as if the man would have died the case would have resulted in murder. the case which is barely beyond travelling section 323 can by no means a case where diary may be permitted to be called for.2. hence, in the facts and circumstances of the case. i am inclined to grant bail under section 439, cr.p.c. to the accused petitioners.3. accordingly, the bail application is allowed. the accused petitioners (1) hussain s/o usman khan, (2) togey khan s/o misri khan (3) meercy khan s/o mistri khan, (4) habib khan s/o allah khan, (5) meeray khan s/o raimal khan, and (6) khalak khan s/o haji khan shall be released on bail provided each one of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of rs. 2,000/- and one surety bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned sessions judge, jaisalmer for appearance before him as and when called upon to do so.

Full Judgment

V.S. Dave, J.

1. The learned Public Prosecutor wants to call for the case diary. I regret that this is not a case where time may be granted for sending for the case diary as it is a case where six accused persons have been alleged to have committed offences under Sections 147, 325, 307, 451 and 171, I.P.C. A perusal of the injury report discloses two contusions whose dimensions are not more than 3 cm in any case, one abrasion 1 1/2 cm and complaining of chest pain which of course is due to fracture of the ribs. The author of this injury is not known. With the aforesaid minor injuries on the person of the injured it would be too risky and rather venture some to attract Section 147 with the intention of causing death as if the man would have died the case would have resulted in murder. The case which is barely beyond travelling Section 323 can by no means a case where diary may be permitted to be called for.

2. Hence, in the facts and circumstances of the case. I am inclined to grant bail under Section 439, Cr.P.C. to the accused petitioners.

3. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. The accused petitioners (1) Hussain s/o Usman Khan, (2) Togey khan s/o Misri Khan (3) Meercy Khan s/o Mistri Khan, (4) Habib Khan s/o Allah Khan, (5) Meeray Khan s/o Raimal Khan, and (6) Khalak Khan s/o Haji Khan shall be released on bail provided each one of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 2,000/- and one surety bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Jaisalmer for appearance before him as and when called upon to do so.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial