Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Budh Singh and ors.

State of Rajasthan and anr. vs Budh Singh and ors.

Disposition Writ petition dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Jul 31, 2003
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/762650

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5780 of 2000
Subject
Civil
Disposition
Writ petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Civil
Outcome / disposition
Writ petition dismissed
Acts & sections
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of Rajasthan and anr.

Advocate M.C. Gupta, Adv.

Respondent

Budh Singh and ors.

Advocate C.L. Saini, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
Reported In
RLW2004(1)Raj148; 2003(4)WLC115

Excerpt

- parihar, j.1. petitioners have challenged the order dated 24.4.2000 passed by the rajasthan non-government educational institutions tribunal, jaipur, by which respondent no. 1 has been ordered to be given certain benefits.2. the directions for making payment had been issued only to respondent no. 2, the institution where the concerned employee had been working. no directions, whatsoever, have been issued so far as the present petitioners are concerned. it is not known as to how the petitioners are aggrieved by the order of the tribunal. the present writ petition appears to be a sheet misuse of due process of law not only wasting the time of this court, but also putting the state exchequer with unnecessary cost of the litigation. it seems that the concerned offices who gave approval for filing the present writ petition, acted in just mechanical manner without any application of mind. filing of writ petition by the government departments by way of formality is highly depricable.3. the writ petition is dismissed accordingly as having no merits with a cost of rs. 10,000/- to be paid to respondent no. 1. the cost be recovered from the concerned officers who gave approval for filing the present writ petition. the cost be paid within 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. a copy of this order may also be sent to the chief secretary of the state for information and further necessary directions to all the concerning authorities.

Full Judgment

Parihar, J.

1. Petitioners have challenged the order dated 24.4.2000 passed by the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Tribunal, Jaipur, by which respondent No. 1 has been ordered to be given certain benefits.

2. The directions for making payment had been issued only to respondent No. 2, the Institution where the concerned employee had been working. No directions, whatsoever, have been issued so far as the present petitioners are concerned. It is not known as to how the petitioners are aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal. The present writ petition appears to be a sheet misuse of due process of law not only wasting the time of this court, but also putting the State exchequer with unnecessary cost of the litigation. It seems that the concerned offices who gave approval for filing the present writ petition, acted in just mechanical manner without any application of mind. Filing of writ petition by the Government departments by way of formality is highly depricable.

3. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly as having no merits with a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid to respondent No. 1. The cost be recovered from the concerned officers who gave approval for filing the present writ petition. The cost be paid within 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. A copy of this order may also be sent to the Chief Secretary of the State for information and further necessary directions to all the concerning authorities.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial