Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dhana Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Dhana Ram vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Aug 25, 1988
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/762608

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Cr. Revision Petition No. 228 of 1988
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code - Section 326--Sentence--Accused 18 years old--Grievous injury caused to little finger--Parties near relations--Held, sentence of 2.5 years is reduced to 6 months.;Revision Partly Allowed -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhana Ram

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1988WLN(UC)146

Excerpt

penal code - section 326--sentence--accused 18 years old--grievous injury caused to little finger--parties near relations--held, sentence of 2.5 years is reduced to 6 months.;revision partly allowed - m.c. jain, j.1. heard learned counsel for the parties after notice to the public presecutor.2. the petitioner has been convicted for the offences under section 326 ipc and sentenced to 2.5 years rigorous imprisonment and under section 447 ipc and he is sentenced to one month's rigorous imprisonment. both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently by the learned munsif and judicial magistrate, first class, makarana by his judgment dated 5-5-1983. his appeal was dismissed by the learned sessions judge, merta vide judgment dated 10-8-1988. learned counsel for the petitioner has not challenged the conviction of the petitioner. he, however, urged that the petitioner is aged about 18 years. the grievous injury has been caused to the little finger of the left hand. the parties are near relations, so, it is urged that sentence awarded is severe and the sentence may be reduced to four months.3. having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in my opinion, sentence of six months rigorous imprisonment would be adequate.4. accordingly, the revision petition is partly allowed and conviction of the petitioner is maintained. his sentence for the offence under section 326 ipc is reduced to six months rigorous imprisonment. his conviction and sentence for the offence under section 447 ipc are maintained. it is further ordered that the petitioner shall pay a sum of rs. 1000/- by way of compensation to the injured shivdan.

Full Judgment

M.C. Jain, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties after notice to the Public Presecutor.

2. The petitioner has been convicted for the offences under Section 326 IPC and sentenced to 2.5 years rigorous imprisonment and under Section 447 IPC and he is sentenced to one month's rigorous imprisonment. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently by the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, first class, Makarana by his judgment dated 5-5-1983. His appeal was dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge, Merta vide judgment dated 10-8-1988. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has not challenged the conviction of the petitioner. He, however, urged that the petitioner is aged about 18 years. The grievous injury has been caused to the little finger of the left hand. The parties are near relations, so, it is urged that sentence awarded is severe and the sentence may be reduced to four months.

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in my opinion, sentence of six months rigorous imprisonment would be adequate.

4. Accordingly, the revision petition is partly allowed and conviction of the petitioner is maintained. His sentence for the offence under Section 326 IPC is reduced to six months rigorous imprisonment. His conviction and sentence for the offence under Section 447 IPC are maintained. It is further ordered that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs. 1000/- by way of compensation to the injured Shivdan.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial