Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lila Textile Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Lila Textile vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Oct 27, 1999
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/762282

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 448 of 1989
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation
Acts & sections
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131 and 131(3)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lila Textile

Advocate Rajendra Mehta, Adv.

Respondent

Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Advocate Sandeep Bhandawat, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131 and 131(3)
Reported In
[2000]245ITR826(Raj)

Excerpt

- b.s. chauhan, j.1. the instant writ petition has been filed for seeking' direction to return the documents impounded by the respondents on february 10, 1989. there is dispute on the factum whether the documents were impounded from the premises of the petitioner or they were impounded when the same were produced before the assessing authority in response to the notice under section 131(3) of the income-tax act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the act').2. whatever may be the mode of impounding', the purpose of impounding the documents is to ascertain whether the assessee has concealed the income. even if the version of the revenue is accepted, there is a flagrant violation of clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (3) of section 131 of the act, as the assessing authority has not recorded any reason for impounding the document nor has he sought the approval from the higher authority. shri sandecp bhandawat has drawn the attention of the court to the contents of annexure r/4 which provides for the so-called reasons recorded by the assessing authority. the reasons recorded therein do not meet the requirement of law as it simply provides for impounding the documents which had been produced before the assessing authority.3. in view of the above, the order dated february 10, 1989, of impounding the documents is hereby quashed and the assessing authority is directed to release the documents impounded, if not already released in pursuance of interim order passed by this court, within two weeks from the date of production of the order before the authority concerned. there shall be no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

B.S. Chauhan, J.

1. The instant writ petition has been filed for seeking' direction to return the documents impounded by the respondents on February 10, 1989. There is dispute on the factum whether the documents were impounded from the premises of the petitioner or they were impounded when the same were produced before the assessing authority in response to the notice under Section 131(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act').

2. Whatever may be the mode of impounding', the purpose of impounding the documents is to ascertain whether the assessee has concealed the income. Even if the version of the Revenue is accepted, there is a flagrant violation of clauses (a) and (b) of Sub-section (3) of Section 131 of the Act, as the assessing authority has not recorded any reason for impounding the document nor has he sought the approval from the higher authority. Shri Sandecp Bhandawat has drawn the attention of the court to the contents of annexure R/4 which provides for the so-called reasons recorded by the assessing authority. The reasons recorded therein do not meet the requirement of law as it simply provides for impounding the documents which had been produced before the assessing authority.

3. In view of the above, the order dated February 10, 1989, of impounding the documents is hereby quashed and the assessing authority is directed to release the documents impounded, if not already released in pursuance of interim order passed by this court, within two weeks from the date of production of the order before the authority concerned. There shall be no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial