Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Keshar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Keshar vs State of Rajasthan

Disposition Application allowed Court Rajasthan Decided May 26, 1989
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/761270

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 1269 of 1989
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code - Section 302 and Criminal Procedure Code--Section 439--Bail--High Court directed on 9-9-1988 to complete trial within 4 months--No cogent reason for not completing trial inspite of 8 months--Latches on part of prosecution--Held, accused cannot be kept in custody indefinitely.;Bail Granted -

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Application allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Keshar

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1989WLN(UC)46

Excerpt

penal code - section 302 and criminal procedure code--section 439--bail--high court directed on 9-9-1988 to complete trial within 4 months--no cogent reason for not completing trial inspite of 8 months--latches on part of prosecution--held, accused cannot be kept in custody indefinitely.;bail granted - v.s. dave, j.1. accused petitioner is facing trial for offence under section 302, ipc in the court of sessions judge, sikar. the accused was arrested in march, 1988 and he moved an application for bail under section 439, cr.p.c. before this court which was rejected by this court on 10-5-1988 observing that it would be open to the petitioner to move a bail application after the charge sheet is submitted. the accused there after had moved another bail application on august 1, 1983 after submission of the charge-sheet but that too was rejected. how ever, direction was given to the trial court to complete the trial within four months from the date of receipt of this order. copy of the order was communicated to the learned sessions judge, sikar vide letter no. cr/judl. /88/6856 dated 9-9-1988 but till date trial is not complete despite the fact that 8 months have elapsed.2. public prosecutor could not furnish any cogent reason for not completing the prosecution evidence till now. the accused cannot be kept indefinitely in custody for latches on the part of the prosecution in completing the trial, particularly when the directions are issued by this court. non observance of the direction of this court is a matter to be seriously viewed. in this view and the circumstances of the case i am inclined to grant indulgence to the accused.3. it is therefore, ordered that the accused petitioner keshar son of pokhar r/o swami-ki-dhani be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of rs. 10,000/- with two sureties in the sum of rs. 5000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with stipulation to appear in that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial against him in this case.

Full Judgment

V.S. Dave, J.

1. Accused petitioner is facing trial for offence under Section 302, IPC in the Court of Sessions Judge, Sikar. The accused was arrested in March, 1988 and he moved an application for bail under Section 439, Cr.P.C. before this court which was rejected by this Court on 10-5-1988 observing that it would be open to the petitioner to move a bail application after the charge sheet is submitted. The accused there after had moved another bail application on August 1, 1983 after submission of the charge-sheet but that too was rejected. How ever, direction was given to the trial court to complete the trial within four months from the date of receipt of this order. Copy of the order was communicated to the learned Sessions Judge, Sikar vide letter No. CR/Judl. /88/6856 dated 9-9-1988 But till date trial is not complete despite the fact that 8 months have elapsed.

2. Public Prosecutor could not furnish any cogent reason for not completing the prosecution evidence till now. The accused cannot be kept indefinitely in custody for latches on the part of the prosecution in completing the trial, particularly when the directions are issued by this court. Non observance of the direction of this court is a matter to be seriously viewed. In this view and the circumstances of the case I am inclined to grant indulgence to the accused.

3. It is therefore, ordered that the accused petitioner Keshar son of Pokhar r/o Swami-ki-Dhani be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 5000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with stipulation to appear in that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial against him in this case.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial